this post was submitted on 06 Sep 2024
-56 points (15.9% liked)

politics

18870 readers
4775 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] skvlp@lemm.ee 30 points 1 week ago (39 children)

My two cents is that the two party system is thoroughly broken. But I don’t know how to fix it. Dividing the votes for those who aren’t fascist is probably not a good move though.

[–] slaveOne@reddthat.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ranked choice voting would be a start

[–] skvlp@lemm.ee 2 points 1 week ago

That would be a big improvement. I’m also curious about approval voting. But either would be a big improvement over the mess that is first past the post, winner takes it all.

load more comments (38 replies)
[–] skeezix@lemmy.world 23 points 1 week ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MediaBiasFactChecker@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The news source of this post could not be identified. Please check the source yourself. Media Bias Fact Check | bot support

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You know what amazes me most about you? You're mostly meet with vitriol from all sides, and remain civil, kind, and pleasant. Let 'em stand on your imaginary cape. You're a real world model of behavior, and while you're probably a good 10 years or so behind me in age, a role model not to let abuse and trauma drag me backwards. Thanks for being that daily inspiration. You have no idea how valuable that is, to me.

[–] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Is this satire? You’re having a conversation with an automated bot account?

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth -2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I've interacted with this person besides in public. They are a real human, with real hopes, dreams, desires, fears and feelings, much like yourself. Perhaps by suspending disbelief for a moment and not bullying him, you may be pleasantly surprised.

[–] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Dude - you replied to the Media Bias Fact Check bot, not a human.

https://lemmy.world/u/MediaBiasFactChecker

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't know, I replied to the comment in notifications by directly tapping it. Another user said the same thing in another thread, and when I said so, I was downvoted. Idk if it's client software or mine, but they're clearly not interacting well together. Thanks for letting me know. I'll msg admin and see if we can sorry if.

[–] geekwithsoul@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is what it appears like to me if it helps

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 0 points 1 week ago

Oh wow, rofl. Thanks. I went back to the post and scrolled to reply to this comment. I am not sure where I should've gone with it, but I did message one admin with a link to your post telling me about it and asked for direction to the proper place to report it or help correcting it. I'm sure the photo will help devs, if not me. Thanks again.

load more comments
view more: next ›