this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
29 points (93.9% liked)

Europe

8484 readers
4 users here now

News/Interesting Stories/Beautiful Pictures from Europe ๐Ÿ‡ช๐Ÿ‡บ

(Current banner: Thunder mountain, Germany, ๐Ÿ‡ฉ๐Ÿ‡ช ) Feel free to post submissions for banner pictures

Rules

(This list is obviously incomplete, but it will get expanded when necessary)

  1. Be nice to each other (e.g. No direct insults against each other);
  2. No racism, antisemitism, dehumanisation of minorities or glorification of National Socialism allowed;
  3. No posts linking to mis-information funded by foreign states or billionaires.

Also check out !yurop@lemm.ee

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] taanegl@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

We should make a system dependant upon culpability. If France helps in the downfall of some country, causing a migrant crisis in the process, then their quota for asylum seekers should go up to accommodate their stupid geopolitical tomfoolery.

It's a geo-political "put your money where you mouth is" kind of system.

[โ€“] federalreverse@feddit.de 20 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

We all are causing migration by buying fossil fuels from autocracies, then burning them and also by furthering unfair trade. I guess we need to take in refugees.

[โ€“] taanegl@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

That's pretty one sided though. It's like saying the autocrats don't burn an insane amount of fuel, thereby also exacerbating the issue. If they were all using solar panels, scaling down their fossil fuel industries and actually gave a damn about the environment, then we'd be in agreement.

Oh there will be climate refugees, no doubt about it. But whitewashing the autocrats use of petroleum and using it to justify breaking a system meant to moderate something makes me think you're the left wing equivalent of republicans.

You do not game systems, you reform them, or even replace them... so pass laws that put embargos and sanctions on imported petroleum instead.

Good luck with that.

[โ€“] federalreverse@feddit.de 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I didn't say anything about the behavior of autocracies, why are you dragging that in? Nobody expects moral behavior from them anyway.

I am just saying that a lot of evils are in the world simply because democracies ignore their supposed values whenever convenient. This tends to come back.

[โ€“] realitista@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

I've said this exact thing in the past. The ones calling for war in Syria or Iraq or Afghanistan should be the ones taking the refugees. And they should be housed in the politicians houses that supported it :-)

[โ€“] brainrein@feddit.de 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Freedom of Movement is a human right! Everywhere. For everybody. In every direction!

[โ€“] realitista@lemm.ee 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It's a nice sentiment but it would cause a lot of issues.

[โ€“] brainrein@feddit.de 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I think it would solve a lot of issues, at least in the long run.

[โ€“] realitista@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

Probably would in the long run but we'd have to live through decades of upheaval as workers in rich countries saw their wages plummet to 10% or less of what they were. Even just tiny amounts of immigration cause ultra right wing movements to start taking majorities. We would be living under fascism, and fascism isn't easy to get rid of.