this post was submitted on 18 Dec 2023
196 points (98.5% liked)

politics

18852 readers
4259 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
  2. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  3. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  4. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
  5. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  6. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Moobythegoldensock@lemm.ee 67 points 9 months ago (2 children)

In the healthcare industry, there’s discussion on whether accepting a free lunch or even a branded pen counts as bribery. But when the Supreme Court does it…

[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 11 points 9 months ago

The people at the top don't want the people under them competing with them for bribes. They want to make sure all gifts come directly to them.

[–] Monument@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 9 months ago

In my industry, we cannot receive gifts over $10, even from colleagues.

Office holiday parties are funny. Everyone just trades gift cards.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

why do all "conservatives" end up being simple money grubbing pigs

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 3 points 9 months ago

Yeah, this sounds like he has a desperate need to be able to live the lifestyle of other high paid people around the Washington area instead of being content to live very comfortably on almost 300k a year.

[–] Cranakis@lemmy.one 22 points 9 months ago (2 children)

So conservatives rushed in with a steady stream of gifts and perks to make Thomas wealthy so he'd stay and continue rubber stamping anything sent his way. It's disgustingly corrupt.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 12 points 9 months ago

Thomas wanted to make liberals' lives miserable since the very beginning of his appointment. The liberals haven't paid him to change his mind.

[–] ForestOrca@kbin.social 6 points 9 months ago

I believe you mis-spelled "blatantly".

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 18 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] zzzz@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Thank you for this. Please keep posting it. This was my first time seeing it.

[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 months ago

Yw, it was just starting to get spammy, I think I posted it 4 or 5 times in different ways.

Uh.. real talk: I’m sure all his complaints about money did was to catch the interest of some rich people who were more than happy to enable the Supreme Court justice’s ongoing unsustainable lifestyle.

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 7 points 9 months ago

Why wouldn't it spark fears that he would easily take bribes? The practically untouchable nature of his position means he's in the perfect position to do so.

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 6 points 9 months ago

A key problem here is that it's much harder to get a bribery conviction in the US than most other first-world countries; you need to actually demonstrate the intent for quid pro quo, not that that the rich are shoveling money at an official.

[–] detalferous@lemm.ee 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Certainly the solution is less avocado toast

[–] TheJims@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

Never too late to learn a trade.

[–] BigMacHole@lemm.ee 5 points 9 months ago

It's a good thing people with cases before the Court paid him not to!

-Republicans who think a judge giving $20 to Biden's campaign is corruption.

[–] toaster@slrpnk.net 3 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Fears he would resign? Bring it on lol.

[–] LesserAbe@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's the trick. Conservatives didn't want him to leave, so they stepped in with a bunch of gifts so he would stay, and then owe them favors too.

[–] Dkarma@lemmy.world 3 points 9 months ago

That's a bingo