In the healthcare industry, there’s discussion on whether accepting a free lunch or even a branded pen counts as bribery. But when the Supreme Court does it…
politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
The people at the top don't want the people under them competing with them for bribes. They want to make sure all gifts come directly to them.
In my industry, we cannot receive gifts over $10, even from colleagues.
Office holiday parties are funny. Everyone just trades gift cards.
why do all "conservatives" end up being simple money grubbing pigs
Yeah, this sounds like he has a desperate need to be able to live the lifestyle of other high paid people around the Washington area instead of being content to live very comfortably on almost 300k a year.
So conservatives rushed in with a steady stream of gifts and perks to make Thomas wealthy so he'd stay and continue rubber stamping anything sent his way. It's disgustingly corrupt.
Thomas wanted to make liberals' lives miserable since the very beginning of his appointment. The liberals haven't paid him to change his mind.
I believe you mis-spelled "blatantly".
I can't believe I have to keep posting this, it's not just Thomas, it's 5 out of 9 that seem to have taken bribes:
- Jane Roberts, who is married to Chief Justice John Roberts, made $10.3 million in commissions from elite law firms, whistleblower documents show Note: It's not in the title, but he presided over one of their cases.
- Calls for Clarence Thomas Impeachment Vote After Report Exposes Billionaire-Funded Trips
- Kavanaugh accuser Ford testifies she 'believed he was going to rape' her & The Mystery of Brett Kavanaugh’s Baseball-Ticket Debt
- FBI interviewed individuals who accuse Amy Coney Barrett faith group of abuse
- Supreme Court Justice Sotomayor’s staff prodded colleges and libraries to buy her books
- Justice Samuel Alito Took Luxury Fishing Vacation With GOP Billionaire Who Later Had Cases Before the Court
- Law firm head bought Gorsuch-owned property
Thank you for this. Please keep posting it. This was my first time seeing it.
Yw, it was just starting to get spammy, I think I posted it 4 or 5 times in different ways.
Uh.. real talk: I’m sure all his complaints about money did was to catch the interest of some rich people who were more than happy to enable the Supreme Court justice’s ongoing unsustainable lifestyle.
Why wouldn't it spark fears that he would easily take bribes? The practically untouchable nature of his position means he's in the perfect position to do so.
A key problem here is that it's much harder to get a bribery conviction in the US than most other first-world countries; you need to actually demonstrate the intent for quid pro quo, not that that the rich are shoveling money at an official.
Certainly the solution is less avocado toast
Never too late to learn a trade.
It's a good thing people with cases before the Court paid him not to!
-Republicans who think a judge giving $20 to Biden's campaign is corruption.
Fears he would resign? Bring it on lol.
That's the trick. Conservatives didn't want him to leave, so they stepped in with a bunch of gifts so he would stay, and then owe them favors too.
That's a bingo