negativenull

joined 11 months ago
[–] negativenull@startrek.website 7 points 11 months ago

Oh man, so many good ones today! Most days only had 1 or 2 submissions.

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 5 points 11 months ago

Yes, that about sums it up I suppose!

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

This is also better than mine! Though I only see 9 Rikers (non-bearded Rikers are not Riker)

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I know @ummthatguy has this covered, but I came prepared as well.

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 5 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Oh man, that is even better! Use this one for sure!!!!

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago

This one was worrying me (11 rikers would be very busy indeed).

Since "Riking" isn't defined, I took some liberty with the final one. I grabbed the screenshots from: here

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 16 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Eleven Rikers Riking:

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The Orville - Pastafarianism
Galaxy Quest - Rastafarianism

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The original series in the 1970s leaned more into Mormon cosmology. The more recent version didn't do that as much, so it's harder to tell.

[–] negativenull@startrek.website 7 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Battlestar Galactica should surly be Mormonism

 
 
 
 

Actually was part of a Muppets Calendar in 1997:
https://muppet.fandom.com/wiki/Muppet_Parody_Calendar:_The_Sequel

 
 
 
 
  • The Supreme Court upheld Washington state's law banning "conversion therapy" for minors, despite dissent from three conservative justices.
  • An appellate panel struck down local bans on conversion therapy in Florida, deeming them an unconstitutional restriction on counselors' speech.
  • Justice Clarence Thomas argued that the court should have taken up the case and considered the First Amendment challenge to the law.
view more: ‹ prev next ›