ivemadeamoostake

joined 1 year ago
[–] ivemadeamoostake@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is only a small advice. Take it or leave it, of course. Burn out is real, if that's what your are experiencing. And it effects all parts of your life. For example, if you have burn out because of work, your hobbies suffer because you're just burnt out.

Be kind to yourself. Life, or burn out, only gets even worse when you get mad at yourself for not doing something or not being productive. It's okay to be tired. It sucks when life takes away from your hobbies and the things you love. But don't beat yourself up! It's okay to do nothing even when it doesn't feel okay.

[–] ivemadeamoostake@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Same. So glad I grew out of that edgy phase.

[–] ivemadeamoostake@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 year ago

Just remember you are strong for sloughing through all that day in and day out! It's very impressive!

[–] ivemadeamoostake@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Good question! I looked up the poverty line in LA specifically. And here are the results:

Persons in Family Household - ​Poverty Guideline (annually): 1 person - $​14,580 / 2 persons - $19,720 / 3 persons - $24,860

This is a very quick look for an answer. I don't fully understand the results.

The long and short of it is $25,000/year is over the poverty line for a single person household but barely over the poverty line for a 2 person household. It is the poverty line for a household of 3 or more people.

It is unclear how this factors in housing, and if it includes owning property and renting. A 3 person household is generally considered to be two adults and a child or dependant. Livable, depends on what you considered livable. If owning a house and starting a family is part of having a libable life, I would say they are probably not earning a livable wage.

Source: Californial Department of Public Health https://www.cdph.ca.gov/Programs/CID/DOA/Pages/OA_ADAP_Federal_Poverty_Guideline_Chart.aspx

Edit formatting

[–] ivemadeamoostake@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Drop some links my dude!

[–] ivemadeamoostake@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago

There's actually some historical context for this untrue way of thinking.

France, 1873 Paul Broca, a French physician, decides to weigh some brains. And women's brains weighed less than men's brains. This is part of his research into crainiometry in which the size of the brain is used to understand a mesure of intelligence. Bigger brain weight = more smart.

We now recognize crainiometry as a pesudoscience.

Then another French academic Gustav Le Bon uses Broca's research to further engain that not only are women's brains small causing them to have the big dumb, women are in fact more similar to gorillas in brain size. Thus, women are uncivilized, akin to children, and MUST be under the care and control of men who are CLEARLY more intelligent with their big brains and, naturally, should control and run society.

Broca did not take overall body size or age of the specimens into account when originally weighing the brains. The male specimens were younger and larger to the female specimens who were smaller and older. Brains tend to shrink as we age.

So, not only was this flawed science, based in flawed measurements, thay have been readily disproved, we're still struggling to undo this as a belief.

History rant over.