At the moment they work like email addresses. You have an xyz@gmail.com account, you can only log into gmail.com’s server. But you can talk to abc@outlook.com, the fediverse (gmail.com and outlook.com’s servers) takes care of passing the messages / posts for you.
1Fuji2Taka3Nasubi
joined 1 year ago
Why is there no 28 Months Later?
52
Also, the button layout on switch controllers is different (A & B is swapped compared to XBox). This mostly matters on emulators, although you can remap the buttons, it can get confusing that they don’t match the games’ instructions on screen.
In fact, USB 3 can cause interference with 2.4GHz wireless so a 2.0 hub could actually be better for OP’s purpose. It probably won’t make much of a difference unless you’re plugging in a thumb drive right next to the receiver though.
I really hate that you can only open one settings page at a time. There is no justification to making you lose your place you’re working on just because you want to adjust another minor setting. With the old interface I can e.g. have network and sound settings open at the same time and I don’t know why they took that away.
Yes, not the best things people have done in the name of their country.
- One of the government's justification for the practice was "It was lawful at the time". Now the Supreme Court ruled the law was never constitutional.
- The Supreme Court also decided that "statute of limitations" does not apply so plaintiffs can still seek compensation.
I agree that the issues
- whether AI output are derivative works of its input, and
- whether input to AI is fair use and requires no compensation
are separate, but I think they are related, in that AI companies are trying to impose whatever interpretation of copyright that is convenient to them to the rest of the society.
And indeed Meta pirated books to feed its AI.
https://www.techspot.com/news/101507-meta-admits-using-pirated-books-train-ai-but.html
Don't know about OpenAI, but Meta used pirated books to train its AI.
https://www.techspot.com/news/101507-meta-admits-using-pirated-books-train-ai-but.html
Reproduction of copyrighted material would be breaking the law. Studying it and using it as reference when creating original content is not.
I’m curious why we think otherwise when it is a student obtaining an unauthorized copy of a textbook to study, or researchers getting papers from sci-hub. Probably because it benefits corporations and they say so?
And to think we want to abolish leap seconds because they are ‘too hard’.
view more: next ›
Yes, you could have watched a 5- (or 10-) years old movie and went there for a forum full of threads about that specific movie. Some threads might be old, but people did make new threads even after years, and they were all in one place and easy to find. It was a big loss when it was shut down, and I haven’t found a place that offers a similar experience.