this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2023
206 points (96.4% liked)

Asklemmy

43940 readers
729 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The way I see it that instinct is the cause behind so much suffering and injustice in the world.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] donut4ever@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

It will never happen as long as there is injustice in the world. Also, there isn't a perfect world where justice is 100% served. A good book to read about that (political book, but goes through the us vs them) is "why we are polarized" by Ezra Klein.

The "Us vs. Them" mentality is also called the "in-group bias", in which you tend to align with other members of a perceived group (with little to no logical reason, it can be as simple as belts vs. suspenders). Like many other fallacies or biases, it is a built-in feature of our caveman-brains that no longer benefits us. When used in propaganda, it is often paired with the "strawman fallacy" to build the perception of an enemy that is barely even human.

You can learn to recognize these biases in yourself and in others - This is called critical thinking. I recommend the podcast "You Are Not So Smart" to everyone to get more insight on this subject.

[–] imaqtpie@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No. That is human nature. In order to overcome that, we would have to evolve into a different species, which I would argue is less appealing than it might sound on the surface.

Instead of trying to overcome it, it makes more sense to build a society that directs that energy in a positive direction.

[–] realcaseyrollins@kbin.projectsegfau.lt 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe a solution could be getting rid of some tribes entirely, so that we're not so divided? We can still have tribes, but we really don't need this many of them

[–] Nutteman@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uhhh are you calling for genny cide ride now my man?

[–] PickTheStick@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nutteman! Hey, Nutteman! Race war? Nutteman! Hey, Nutteman!

[–] Nutteman@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

God dammit why did Trevor have to die? Wkuk sketches bum me out now. Still so fucking funny though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xepher@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

There's a book I read a few years ago named "Tribe: On Homecoming and Belonging" that delvs into this a bit and why humans are so tribal instinctively. Would highly recommend.

https://www.amazon.com/Tribe-Homecoming-Belonging-Sebastian-Junger/dp/1455566381?ref=d6k_applink_bb_dls&dplnkId=2999a0a3-f1d3-4c19-b97a-6215a1e3c695

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 2 points 1 year ago

Not unless the fundamentals of human psychology change. Forever is a long time to say that won’t happen but certainly not in the foreseeable future.

That doesn’t mean it can’t be worked on or mitigated. But it’s not going away completely.

[–] ProtonBadger@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

We get tribal over everything. Countries, gangs, skin color, sexuality, religion, even bloody brand of smartphone makes us bicker or call the other person dumb. And the budding optimistic globalism that was happening have totally reversed in the last few years, it was an illusion.

I've stopped watching/reading news. I can't take it anymore. I lost hope.

Maybe in the extreme future but right now we've just barely started as a species, will we exist long enough to grow up?

[–] Telorand@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This current version of humans? No. But could it ever happen? Absolutely, if we assume our future evolutionary human descendants survive and provided we can supply everyone's needs.

[–] A_A@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Yes ...and the name will have to change from Homo sapiens to something else.

[–] Ghostc1212@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Homo Evolutis

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Platform27@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

No. There will always be another β€œthem”. That’s what makes humans so great, but also so destructive. We never settle, and will always look for division, even if we need to create it.

[–] Hextic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think we could if enough effort was put forth into making it happen. The problem is that very same "instinct," or rather the plethora of different experiences and ideals held by individuals seems to make it harder if not impossible to ever come to a global united consensus on anything.

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I hope so. Knowledge and curiousity feed intelligence feed knowledge feed curiousity. A highly educated society with healthy education sytem and good working socioeconomy (concurency in news coverage) can theoretically get over "us vs. them". Until we someday maybe lose it as evolutionary trait.

[–] style99@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

The way I see it that instinct is the cause behind so much suffering and injustice in the world.

That's just what they want you to think.

Hey man, we’ll quit fighting when they do.

[–] Dubious_Fart@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

We will not evolve out of our petty differences until we have UtopiaTech like Star Trek Replicators that can satisfy every basic need, and allow people to pursue dreams, ideas, and hopes, free of the burden of having to run the orphan crushing machine just to desperately survive another day.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Arguably we're doing a decent job right now. I'd say a majority of people in the West think genocide is bad, no exceptions made for any particular case. We'll never move past the tendency, transhumanism aside, but with enough education we can learn to identify it in ourselves and recognise it's wrong and bad.

[–] socsa@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Yes, because it has for thousands of years. Sure, it draws new lines, but then it overcomes them. It's almost like human history is the history of social and political progress.

[–] MaShinKotoKai@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The news feeding propaganda over and over isn't helping.

[–] TrismegistusMx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Not as long as capitalist nationalism is the dominant economic system. It's just tribalism on a global scale.

[–] metawish@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Bold to assume that it's an instinct and not a taught and learned behavior.

[–] Cybersteel@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Never. We will even discriminate against people with different ear length if it get that's far. Conflict is inevitable, it's in our genes, our memes.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The late rapper, "Eyedea" of Eyedea & Abilities had a really memorable verse in a song that always comes to mind when I hear this discussed.

Grinding my teeth as I’m peddling uphill / The fight against ape-hood is fate versus free will / We think we've advanced but there's nowhere to go / Mammals stay captive to animal actions / So slowly we climb up this DNA brick wall / Addicted to emptiness, anger and pitfalls / Desire for space, territory, or lust / We'll eventually turn this whole planet to dust

load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί