this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
527 points (96.0% liked)

Memes

45730 readers
1535 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HakFoo@lemmy.sdf.org 70 points 1 year ago (3 children)

This is an interesting sabotage to any figures that want to maintain their presence.

If you search for "brandname twitter", you're probably going to get what you want. "brandname x" will be a SEO catastrophe.

Maybe they hoped to drive people to navigate through their own site and search facilities, but generally, not being where people are looking is a terrible strategy even on a chain of bad strategies.

[–] beta@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Corporations just seem to be getting more and more abstract... Here's my ✨ amazing ✨ (non-complete) list:

  • Oversimplification of logos (*cough* *cough* Firefox killing our fox)
  • Corporate Memphis (that big tech, supper flat, indestiguishable art style)
  • Websites (everything is either a bento box, image carousel, or loaded up with scroll-based animations -- or all of these)
  • Names (Facebook is now Meta, Twitter is becoming X)
[–] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 29 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Firefox still has the fox:

[–] Micromot@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think he mistakenly referred to the firefox group of things like the password manager, the browser still has the fox logo

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Finnbot@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Corporate Memphis is just the worst. I dunno why but it gives me heavy dystopian connotations.

[–] snooggums@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

It kooks like children were forced to design corporate logos in ms paint.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] berkersal@iusearchlinux.fyi 12 points 1 year ago

A brand that limits users on how many content they can see wouldn't want them to use their search engine when there is a free one that does it better

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BudgetBandit@sh.itjust.works 60 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just pronounce it like we would pronounce a Chinese name, where the X are pronounced sh

Twitter -> Xitter [shitter]

[–] HolidayGreed@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It’s a Roman numeral for me…

  • Ten-Men
  • SpaceTen
  • The Ten Factor
  • Tenbox Series Ten
  • Mac OS Ten
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 40 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If X is no longer twitter, how long till the copyright on the twitter brand expires?

You can't argue anyone would confuse a website called twitter with 'X'.

Maybe Zuckerberg could rebrand threads Twitter.

[–] miss_brainfart@lemmy.ml 26 points 1 year ago

That would genuinely be funny, I'm all for it

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Trademark not copyright. Copyright only applies to entire works like a song text or the code Twitter has produced. For example the song title alone is not copyrighted. A trademark realistically only expires when it gets contested in court.

[–] Onionizer@geddit.social 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Is there a law that you must use a trademark to keep it?

[–] irmoz@reddthat.com 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a similar law where you must at least defend a trademark against misuse to keep hold of it. That was the reasoning behind this music video for Velcro:

https://youtu.be/rRi8LptvFZY

So, based on that, maybe they won't lose it just by not using it. But if someone else tried to establish a Twitter product, they may lose the trademark if they don't fight it.

[–] PipedLinkBot@feddit.rocks 4 points 1 year ago

Here is an alternative Piped link(s): https://piped.video/rRi8LptvFZY

Piped is a privacy-respecting open-source alternative frontend to YouTube.

I'm open-source, check me out at GitHub.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Window_System see logo and name in case not familiar with the context

[–] BluDood@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I love how the X wm came from the W wm which was in the V OS

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Supermuff@feddit.de 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

𝕎𝕆𝕎, 𝕊𝕌𝕔𝕙 𝔸𝕟 𝔼𝕏𝕔𝕀𝕋𝕀𝕟𝔾 𝔸𝕟𝔻 𝕔𝕣𝔼𝔸𝕋𝕀𝕍𝔼 𝕀𝕔𝕆𝕟

𝕏

[–] pingveno@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 year ago

Just from an economic standpoint, it's such a terrible decision. The Twitter bird is iconic to the point where the trademark itself is worth a considerable amount. This is like Disney dumping Mickey Mouse for a side character in The Dark Cauldron.

[–] TimeSquirrel@kbin.social 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

RIP people searching google for help with "X" on Windows.

[–] darcy@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

xorg, x11, x display server

x twitter, x.com

[–] Redjard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago

x.org has this a big fat link to follow them under, that must be where the X social network is now.

A guy made wayland social to prove superiority lmao

[–] hayek@feddit.de 16 points 1 year ago

Can’t wait for the first X on X by X Æ A-12 about the SpaceX launch

[–] HerrBoedefeld@feddit.de 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh no, i love the x-com games. They don't deserve to be the name sponsor for Elons weird platform.

[–] BlazeMaster3000@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think he is referring to the X-Men and Wolverine don't deserve to be the name sponsor for Elon's perverted platform.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kSPvhmTOlwvMd7Y7E@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
  • Bland corporations and mediocre CEO when they need to name something * Slaps an X on it *
[–] eldain@feddit.nl 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Classic Elon, will tweeting be called sexting and is this the main reason for the name change?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] friedtofu@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Musk's gon' bill it to ya

Tired of tweeting for free? X's gonna monetize ya

Tap tap, open up the app, it ain't free...

With the non-stop, cash grab of premium fees

Riding rockets, now he's starbound and sold

But he got such a grand scheme

That'll make a tweeter wonder if he’s been memed

Damn right, and he'll charge you again, 'cause he's Elon, so hes gots to spin

Tweet battles with the freemium, but no matter how many cats he boxes with, he'll profit on your scene and win

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Sometimes I wonder if the Claudian letters stuck and, just like we got X for /ks/ (or /gz/... or /ʃ/... or whatever, this letter is a mess), we also got a Ↄ for /ps/. Maybe modern people would be also spamming Ↄ for this sort of "rule of cool"?

[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

When I first read this post, I thought the CSS had gone wonky and part of the O was cut off.

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

·puᴉɯ ou ʎɐꓒ ·ǝnɓoɹ sǝoɓ SSꓛ ǝɥʇ sǝɯᴉʇǝɯoS

[–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] squaresinger@feddit.de 10 points 1 year ago
[–] parlaptie@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I honestly wonder if this is going to end up forcing the X graphics system to rename itself based on trademark law.

[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

I doubt it. They don't compete and X has preceded Elon's rebrand by decades.

[–] DrQuint@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

XBox brand in shambles.

[–] Ilflish@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

"χ"... A most ancient letter. Some say "kye," but the meaning is the same. Death... A letter that spells endings

[–] neopenguin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I'm thinking Elon doing this crazy rename is a throwback

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/X.com

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TurtleLife@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

Elon is breaking up with his X and starting anew

[–] VirtualAlias@reddthat.com 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He's kicking into x.ai. There are good reasons to think that he bought Twitter to use its massive data-set of human language to train an ai - NOT because he gave/gives a shit about Twitter as a profitable company.

If it becomes a paid competitor to OpenAI, it solves its profitability issues without enhancing "Twitter" as a social media site. Anything he said about improving Twitter was likely a lie designed to prolong usage of the platform and enhance the dataset.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why did he have to buy Twitter to get the tweet data? Isn't it all publicly visible? (Seriously asking)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] michaelrose@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Why would you think access to Twitter users nonsense is in any way an improvement over existing training data let alone enough make spending tens of billions for Twitter a good deal. He bought it because he said stupid shit and when he thought he could back out they were suing him to uphold the deal he made to buy it and they were going to win.

load more comments
view more: next ›