this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
743 points (96.8% liked)

News

23417 readers
4177 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HelixDab2@lemm.ee 47 points 2 days ago (17 children)

Fucking FINALLY.

Yes, women should be armed. Gay people should be armed. Trans people should be armed. Religious minorities should be armed. People that are on the political left never should have ceded the right to keep and bear arms to the political right.

I'm planning on getting certified as a firearms instructor through the NRA (because no matter how shitty the NRA-ILA is, the training programs are solid) this coming year so that I can start working with The Pink Pistols and Operation Blazing Spear.

I would strongly suggest that people try reading This Nonviolence Stuff'll Get You Killed: How Guns Made the Civil Rights Movement Possible.

If you're one of the people that is considering getting a gun, please listen to the "It Could Happen Here" podcast episode titled, Safe Gun Ownership.

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I need a plugin like DownThemAll to just add every book on that page (including "Customers also bought...) to my Goodreads want to read.

Narrative nonfiction has become my jam. New favorite category, especially history.

[–] hector@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

This would be a genuinely enriching good read for me. Thanks for the good stuff.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] SpitSalute@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago

We as leftists, must organize in ways that match the fascists. Subversion of their goals is our goal. The class and culture war is in full effect and we must not be complacent.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 38 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

The whole Russian project was to have our "polite society" collapse as we, as Americans, lost all faith in our institutions and turned against one another and in the process, also lost any kind of collective identity, which makes us a weaker target externally. That happened.

It's crazy to me, looking back, how much this was openly discussed along the way, as it successfully happened in slow motion over the last 10-15 years - wasn't there also a book released that just laid their strategy bare? If there are historians in the future, will be amazing to read the perspective on all of this with time and analysis from those not trapped within the cycle of death and hopelessness.

[–] Infomatics90@lemmy.ca 16 points 2 days ago

Yes it is called the foundations of geopolitics, written by Aleksandr Dugin. Its free to read on the internet archive.

[–] Denidil@lemm.ee 19 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It works because those of us who read and learn about things like this are a minority of the population. Not one large enough to counteract the effect either.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] tty5@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Nothing gets republicans talking about gun control faster than minorities arming.

[–] PagingDoctorLove@lemmy.world 19 points 2 days ago (8 children)

I have a conundrum, maybe people in this thread can weigh in.

I'm a woman living in an area with a small but loud MAGA faction and useless police who are probably also Trump supporters. I'm also not white.

Hunting is common here, and although I've never been I do know how to shoot and have access to classes if I want to improve. We also have friends and family with firearms and a couple of them live nearby.

I feel like I should get a gun. I know how to use one and I want to be able to protect myself if necessary. But I'm scared of firearms. Something about them disturbs me. Maybe it's the likelihood of someone dying once a gun comes out. Maybe it's just a fear, however unfounded, that I can't or shouldn't handle such a powerful tool. But the reason behind the feeling doesn't matter so much as my ability to overcome it, and I'm not sure I can. If I had money to burn I'd buy one just to see how I feel, but I don't so I can't.

In short, I'm torn. I want to be able to just get a gun for peace of mind and call it a day, but I fear that as soon as the gun is in my house I will become a nervous wreck and that will defeat the whole purpose.

I'd love to hear from anyone who feels the same or has overcome this fear.

[–] Cataphract@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago

Everything you're describing is completely reasonable. For the past decades, left-wing "policy ideas" have floated banning guns or at least some form of gun control. They state statistics, examples from other countries, testimony from gun experts, etc etc all describing how perfectly harmful just owning a gun can be and how unlikely you are to ever run into a situation where a firearm will improve your situation and chances of surviving.

This has been overtaken by the rhetoric of "they're coming for you!^tm^". The exact same playbook that was used by the right-wing. Who wins? The gun manufacturers and war profiteers.

It's amazing to see the collective consciousness just completely glaze over from just a few years ago. If you think you're statistically more likely to be targeted, then it's your right to procure a firearm in the United States and I'll leave it at that. But, if you actually look into it, you'll find you will be put more in danger by having a firearm in the house than not.

You're right about the mental aspect, if you own a firearm and are constantly thinking about it and the threats it can protect you from, you've created your own hellscape that many are already in. It's much safer and better for the community to be involved in your neighbors lives and to form bonds with those close to you in a positive manner. Somehow, everyone's forgotten the examples the rest of the world has set forth and have fallen into Americana again.

[–] mlfh@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 days ago

Training and familiarization helped me a lot with that exact feeling. I had the same feeling about circular/table saws. My dad was a carpenter, and those things freaked me the hell out - one tiny mistake could have devastating consequences, and that was all I could think about when I was around them. But with careful instruction and exposure, learing to use and be more comfortable with them, that feeling was gradually replaced by calm and confidence, and they changed in my mind from these objects of terror into valuable tools. There was still fear, but it was a healthy, respectful fear.

I went through the exact same process with guns as well. Some classes with a good instructor, giving you a chance to get more comfortable and familiar before you bring a gun into your home, could help a lot.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] GiddyGap@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago

Time to get out of this country.

[–] AeonFelis@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago

Checking 2 boxes out of 4 from the Libertarian dream

[–] kipo@lemm.ee 79 points 3 days ago (9 children)

Jessie McGrath, 63, a lifelong Republican who is trans, grew up around guns on farms in Colorado and Nebraska. She decided to vote for Harris when Republicans started attacking gender-affirming care and “wanting to basically outlaw my ability to exist”. She ended up being a delegate at the Democratic national convention.

“Government getting involved in making healthcare decisions is something that I never thought I would see the Republican party doing,” she said.

What the actual...how are people this ignorant.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 24 points 2 days ago

You know how some cis people are fucking morons? We won’t better than y’all.

[–] Trae@lemmy.world 39 points 3 days ago (8 children)

She was 100% on board with them regulating reproductive care because it has never personally affected her as a biological male.

She only has an issue now that her favorite team turned on her after telling her for the last 30 years that she's next.

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 23 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (55 children)

Assigned male at birth is the term you want to use. "Biological male" is a term used by transphobes to spread misinformation.

Biology is very complex and not your elementary school version of biology. What makes someone "biologically" male? Is it having a penis, having testis, having more testosterone than estrogen, having XY chromosomes? These can all be intermixed with other characteristics.

The "basic biology" definition doesn't work in the real world, and the people using it are actively trying to harm trans people or ignorant. Now you're more informed so ignorance isn't an excuse anymore.

[–] hector@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not super versed into this, just looking to learn 🤗

Individuals having two X chromosomes (XX) are female; individuals having one X chromosome and one Y chromosome (XY) are male.

Doesn't that and having a penis means being a biological man? I don't really see how "biological man" is offensive....

[–] Cethin@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The problem is what does it mean to be biologically a man? Is it a static thing defined at birth or is it a description of the living organism as it exists? (It's the latter.) For example, there are some animals that can change their sex naturally. We don't say they're just the one they're born as.

OK, so now humans. If biological sex is a description of the person as they exist currently, what does it mean for us? Chromosomes are a useful tool because they contain the code that tells our body how to develop, but the actual development is the part that matters, not the chromosomes. The chromosomes will dictate what hormones are produced, and the hormones are what actually control development. We can control what hormones are in the body, so we can hijack the process and change the actual development.

So, since biological sex is a description of the creature as they are, if we hijack the process of development to tell the body to develop according to given sex, that's what their biological sex should be called, right? The clownfish that was once a male that changes into a female is a female. We don't say it's a male just because it once was one.

I can't say whether it's offensive. I'm a cis man. The issue I do know is that it's used by transphobes to pretend like they know more than they do and harm trans people. For example, congress's anti-trans bathroom rule. Speaker Johnson said: "All single-sex facilities in the Capitol and House Office Buildings — such as restrooms, changing rooms, and locker rooms — are reserved for individuals of that biological sex" He's using the term as a weapon, not as a descriptive tool.

Where it's most important is for doctors. My understanding is assigned sex at birth and medical records and understanding who the person is now is the useful information. They do need to know sex assigned at birth, and they also need to know if they're on HRT or have had other procedures. They have to treat trans people differently than their sex at birth because biologically they are different.

[–] hector@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago

I see ! Thanks, this was a very cool insight ❤️

load more comments (54 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 101 points 3 days ago (68 children)

I do not blame any woman or queer person arming themselves in the U.S. right now. But I think that you should think of it as personal protection rather than preparation for something larger.

Be aware of this:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disarmament_of_the_German_Jews

The Jews of Germany constituted less than 1 percent of the country's population. It is preposterous to argue that the possession of firearms would have enabled them to mount resistance against a systematic program of persecution implemented by a modern bureaucracy, enforced by a well-armed police state, and either supported or tolerated by the majority of the German population. Mr. Carson's suggestion that ordinary Germans, had they had guns, would have risked their lives in armed resistance against the regime simply does not comport with the regrettable historical reality of a regime that was quite popular at home. Inside Germany, only the army possessed the physical force necessary for defying or overthrowing the Nazis, but the generals had thrown in their lot with Hitler early on.

Obviously, women and queer people are a lot more than 1% of the population, but you can't count on every queer person being on the right side and you certainly can't count on every woman to be on the right side.

load more comments (68 replies)
[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 72 points 3 days ago (7 children)

The left needs to get on board with this. Govt isn’t going to protect you from far right militias when the shit hits the fan.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Dead_or_Alive@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (14 children)

Lol, this thread is a train wreck and is the perfect example of why Republicans keep winning elections despite being on the wrong side of history and having policies that hurt the American population at large.

The left will never win as long as we form circular firing squads and argue over petty bullshit.

[–] veganpizza69@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

firing squads

You need guns for that.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Yewb@lemmy.world 54 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Im a liberal guess who now has a gun safe with multiple guns?

I guess we are making America great again by arming the liberals too?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] Ekybio@lemmy.world 81 points 3 days ago

With sentiment like "your body, my choice" floating around more and more, I hope that everyone in need will arm themselves accoringly.

Because the guys on the other guys think they are made of steel. Remind them that they have a lot of very vulnerable blood vessels close to the skin and that knifes are as cheap as their lies...

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 63 points 3 days ago (9 children)

Can confirm, my wife has expressed an interest. We're just waiting for the local LGBTQ friendly range to open.

The other local ranges are either run by cops (ACAB) or require NRA memberships to join. Yeah, that's not happening.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›