The bigger problem is that lose should rhyme with pose or close. Loose is fine.
this post was submitted on 20 Nov 2024
173 points (87.8% liked)
Showerthoughts
29851 readers
962 users here now
A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. A showerthought should offer a unique perspective on an ordinary part of life.
Rules
- All posts must be showerthoughts
- The entire showerthought must be in the title
- Avoid politics
- 3.1) NEW RULE as of 5 Nov 2024, trying it out
- 3.2) Political posts often end up being circle jerks (not offering unique perspective) or enflaming (too much work for mods).
- 3.3) Try c/politicaldiscussion, volunteer as a mod here, or start your own community.
- Posts must be original/unique
- Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Don't get me started on ough and ead.
The lead soldier kneaded dough in the bough brush while they read the book that they previously read while taking a furlough in the rough.
Didnβt even have to click. Great poem
load more comments
(1 replies)
I read this and all I could think of was "Buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo buffalo buffalo Buffalo buffalo"
How can the soldier knead anything if they're made of lead?
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(46 replies)
They never did. Their spelling, meaning, and pronunciation are the same as they have always been.
they are very different in my mind. perhaps because i first came across them in their respective contexts through reading.
even when speaking, to me, lose rhymes with booze and loose rhymes with goose.
this has never been a problem for me, personally.
And here's me, another non-native speaker, just learning that booze doesn't rhyme with goose.
oh, no, no, no! booze and a goose should never go together!
load more comments
(1 replies)
I mean yeah 'loose' could probably be pronounced like 'choose' and it would still make sense, but it absolutely wouldnt make sense for 'lose' to be pronounced like 'moose' or 'goose'. Im not sure what you even mean when you say they switched meanings either because thats just false.
english is a very silly language that's evolved so you can do almost anything with it
it's a risky strat but it seems to have worked
May as well combine words with the same pronunciation into one word and call it Simplified English (/s)
Honestly tho, this is one of the features of Simplified Chinese, which created the infamous "fuck vegetables" (εΉ²θη±»).
It's meant to say "dried vegetables" (δΉΎθι‘ in TC), but δΉΎβεΉ². Meanwhile, there exists εΉΉβεΉ² as well, which means "fuck".
load more comments
(4 replies)
They didn't, except among the ignorant and autocorrect.
Loose rhymes with noose. I can't think of a word that's spelled and pronounced like lose so you have me there.
choose lose cruise booze
all rhyme lol
load more comments
(5 replies)
It's a miracle I know it, and having to teach someone how to read and spell was an eye opener for me trying to explain "this is like this except for this one word because... Reasons and sometimes there's a variation like this because...reasons" so many times.
Agreed, I am teaching my second son to read.
I am having the same conversations as when I taught my first to read.
"ok, this word is a 'sight word' because it doesn't make the sounds you expect. It says won, but it looks like it says on-e"
Mostly the "reasons" just boil down to etymology. We spell things the way the languages we stole them from spelled them.
load more comments
(4 replies)
What about the words that are only different in tone.
Content and content
Trust me, it is equally frustrating for most Americans...or almost, anyway.
Wait, if they swapped meanings and then swapped spellings then doesn't that mean they're the same as before?
load more comments
(1 replies)
Read rhymes with lead, and read rhymes with lead, but lead doesn't rhyme with read and lead doesn't rhyme with read.
There's ~~too~~ ~~to~~ two different ways to pronounce and spell many words.
Fuck, that's three!
Steady up over ~~their~~ ~~they're~~ there.
Don't phuck with my head, I'm two drunk!
load more comments
(1 replies)
Are you familiar with βThe Chaosβ by Gerard Nolst TrenitΓ©?
Deep breath:
I believe the generally accepted scientific term for the English language is "clusterfuck".
load more comments
(6 replies)
If we start now, we can probably switch the pronunciations of Aristotle and chipotle within a generation.
Chip-ot-el
load more comments
(1 replies)
Okay TIL that these aren't pronounced the same.
It's a lose/loose situation
English is idiosyncratic as hell. Didnβt someone famous call it βnot a language but 3 languages in an overcoat.β
Adding to this specific instance is that even native speakers spell things wrong. They loose their keys, etc.
Obviously the plural of foot is feet, so the plural of book should be beek.
Or one sheep should be a shoop.
There's also the English Vowel Shift. Which means words either side of it are inconsistent.
view more: next βΊ