this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
904 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
4077 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago

Well to be fair if we just go full ham with crypto mining and so called AI, we'll belch enough GHGs into the atmosphere that the actual climate apocalypse will come within 20 years or so, wiping out most of human so called civilization, which will put the climate on a path to resetting over the next couple hundred thousand years.

Solved!

[–] JesusSon@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago

Let's unshackle him from his wealth and use that to help meet climate goals.

[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sounds like an Onion Article.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] rusticus@lemm.ee 9 points 1 month ago

Obviously this statement underscores the fact that Google has too much power. Break those motherfuckers up!

[–] _bcron_@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

The problem is a confluence of flaws related to capitalism and psychology that allows guys like these to be as they are, gives them ample opportunity to speak, and compels others to listen.

Eric Schmidt and people like him have so much money and influence that they're presented the opportunity to sit down with policy makers and use media as a megaphone to the point that his voice alone is louder than tens of millions of dissenters and the collective group is able to speak over the entire scientific community.

We've normalized it to the point that he can pitch an idea that is as existentially catastrophic as this, and the article writer spins it as some profound statement worthy of deeper discussion.

The CEO of Starbucks attempted to justify flying across state in a jet in order to commute to work, and a lot of people either accept it as some sort of tenet of capitalism or attempt to play the devil's advocate as to why something like that would be deemed necessary by a person. And while he's doing that, he's not univerally lambasted for it, policy doesn't change to prohibit that, and we just squabble amongst ourselves about the merits or necessity.

But as long as guys like these continue to receive money, they and their lobbyists will be chanting the same mantra

[–] crystalmerchant@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Right, let's solve our biggest problem by unfettering capitalism, and definitely will not just further concentrate power and wealth.

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 8 points 1 month ago

Former CEO, current inhumane grifter chud, Eric Schmidt, who has been featured in a recent series of "saying the quiet silicon valley executive thought out loud"

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago

Isn't this a fairly standard sci-fi plot?

AI: Kill humans off, problem solved.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

AI will not find a magic solution. Besides, we already have quite a few directions that would help, but we're not acting on them. Pilling more "solutions" over them won't change that.

This really sounds like the parody of rich people that think they can eat and breath safely as long as they have money, the rest of the world be damned.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thoralf@discuss.tchncs.de 7 points 1 month ago

The climate goals are meetable.

If we want to.

Unless AI forces us to do stuff that we know for decades to be necessary, nothing will change, except a massive amount of additional energy that we need to power the AI.

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not with that attitude, no... asshole! Unshackle AI companies? I'd rather guillotine them.

[–] OutlierBlue@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 month ago

Unshackle their head from their shoulders.

[–] IndiBrony@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Enthusiasticwhale@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well this is the most dumb thing I've read all morning

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] r00ty@kbin.life 7 points 1 month ago

I have a better idea. Let's drop climate conservation, use a load of fossil fuels to fire him in a rocket directly into the sun! Then, resume climate conservation.

[–] TotalCasual@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

This is like Satan saying "We're not going to be able to deal with mass corruption. Just burn everything. That's the solution."

That's an interesting idea... Satan...

[–] skhayfa@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

AI solution = end humanity to save the earth

[–] jaggedrobotpubes@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

This is escapism. Escapism that makes him money.

[–] Cryan24@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Unshakeable AI companies so reprehensible characters like himself can profit from unchecked societal demise more like.

[–] Itdidnttrickledown@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

When these weirdos get older they always stop giving a shit about anyone but themselves or more to the point they stop pretending they ever cared for anyone else.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] SparrowHawk@feddit.it 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

These ppl just want poor people to die and be served by robots, it's never gonna work plus we'll bring them with us

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›