this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
2328 points (99.1% liked)

Technology

59590 readers
4948 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

It had been in the works for a while, but now it has formally been adopted. From the article:

The regulation provides that by 2027 portable batteries incorporated into appliances should be removable and replaceable by the end-user, leaving sufficient time for operators to adapt the design of their products to this requirement.

(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Donder172@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

This is great news.

[–] perezoso@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I've seen a few comments about Bluetooth headphones and TWS earbuds but I don't think it's really too much of an issue. For over ear style headphones Steel Series have already proved the concept as they have a headset that has hot swappable rechargeable batteries. No reason other manufacturers can't design a fitted one that could be replaced.

As for TWS buds, so many of these must already be in landfill when the tiny batteries give out. We've already got rechargeable batteries for hearing aids that can be replaced by the user. I'm sure something similar could be achieved for TWS buds.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] pimpelmees@feddit.nl 10 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I’m all for it, but how is this going to work with tiny things like AirPods? Currently the whole thing is packed with tiny batteries glued onto the electronics so that it can fit in your ears. How do you ever make that replaceable without making them huge?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] donuts@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago

The EU being the voice of reason once again. As someone who has kept his phone alive by swapping the battery (which, with its still probably too hard and involved for the average person even with an ifixit kit), I think we could cut back hugely on e-waste and save people a lot of money by enforcing swappable batteries.

[–] vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (10 children)

2027 is just too long to wait.

I mean, while the idea is nice, it's too slow. There are many ways to fuck up a consumer device, and they are making them illegal one thing at a time.

It's like those privacy laws - no effect at all, while we are now discussing stuff here, on a network designed without any government participation.

[–] Kept7963@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

There's not that much choice there, it genuinely takes 2-3 years to implement hardware that is radically different from what you're currently doing.

Because they're making millions upon millions of phones, they need to really nail the design before they start mass production. And that's neither cheap nor fast.

The big manufacturers can probably afford to do this faster, but the smaller ones might struggle so you need to make it fair.

By 'those privacy laws' do you mean GDPR? Because that's caused Threads not to be released in the EU, and you'll notice that all your devices now have USB C. These regulations have had a pretty significant impact.

[–] bloopinator@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Phones take years to develop. Forcing removable batteries onto manufacturers under an aggressively short timeline would cost billions.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›