this post was submitted on 13 Sep 2024
444 points (96.8% liked)

TenForward: Where Every Vulcan Knows Your Name

3805 readers
722 users here now

/c/TenFoward: Your home-away-from-home for all things Star Trek!

Re-route power to the shields, emit a tachyon pulse through the deflector, and post all the nonsense you want. Within reason of course.

~ 1. No bigotry. This is a Star Trek community. Remember that diversity and coexistence are Star Trek values. Any post/comments that are racist, anti-LGBT, or generally "othering" of a group will result in removal/ban.

~ 2. Keep it civil. Disagreements will happen both on lore and preferences. That's okay! Just don't let it make you forget that the person you are talking to is also a person.

~ 3. Use spoiler tags. This applies to any episodes that have dropped within 3 months prior of your posting. After that it's free game.

~ 4. Keep it Trek related. This one is kind of a gimme but keep as on topic as possible.

~ 5. Keep posts to a limit. We all love Star Trek stuff but 3-4 posts in an hour is plenty enough.

~ 6. Try to not repost. Mistakes happen, we get it! But try to not repost anything from within the past 1-2 months.

~ 7. No General AI Art. Posts of simple AI art do not 'inspire jamaharon'

~ 8. No Political Upheaval. Political commentary is allowed, but please keep discussions civil. Read here for our community's expectations.

Fun will now commence.


Sister Communities:

!startrek@lemmy.world

!memes@lemmy.world

!tumblr@lemmy.world

!lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world

Want your community to be added to the sidebar? Just ask one of our mods!


Honorary Badbitch:

@jawa21@startrek.website for realizing that the line used to be "want to be added to the sidebar?" and capitalized on it. Congratulations and welcome to the sidebar. Stamets is both ashamed and proud.


Creator Resources:

Looking for a Star Trek screencap? (TrekCore)

Looking for the right Star Trek typeface/font for your meme? (Thank you @kellyaster for putting this together!)


founded 10 months ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blackbelt352@lemmy.world 109 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Data was also wasn't a replacement for human labor to enrich the capitalist class. I think AI would be cool if the tangible benefits made everyone's lives better rather than just lining the pockets of rich people.because they fan pay less on labor.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 78 points 2 months ago

Data was an experiment to see if sentient life could be constructed without biological components. There was no goal in mind beyond making him as human as possible. So I agree, I'd call that very different.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 52 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"I hope it comforts you to know Doctor, that I am a product of a ego-maniacal, narcissistic rogue scientist rather than a profit motivated corporation."

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago

It would, actually.

[–] marcos@lemmy.world 26 points 2 months ago

Yep. Data was created by pure human hubris, without contamination from other kinds of emotion. Kinda like the Frankenstein's monster.

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 63 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

DataGPT is what people want. LoreGPT is what people get.

[–] ptz@dubvee.org 35 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Meanwhile, my work is trying to shoehorn in B-4GPT

[–] negativenull@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

All the LLMs stuff is trying to worm their way into everything at my work

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 months ago

“Often wrong”, isn’t that what people call you?

[–] Wilzax@lemmy.world 48 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

If chat GPT were anywhere as advanced as Data I would 100% accept him as a coworker. The problem with LLMs isn't that they're not people, the problem is that they lack any sense of logic and abstract reasoning, relying on heuristic analysis to cover that weakness. As a result, they're quite frequently wrong, and don't have a way to know when they might be wrong, leading to them presenting every answer with the same level of confidence.

[–] Flocklesscrow@lemm.ee 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Remarkably like Baby Boomers

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

EXACTLY like Baby Boomers in government, in fact.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SARGE@startrek.website 43 points 2 months ago

If

Data = current AI

Then

Modern lifeforms = aerobic bacterium,

Modern flip Smartphones = Motorola Microtac,

SR-71 = Wright Model B,

Rimac Never = Ford Model A.

Comparing Data to modern ai is just an insult to Data.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 37 points 2 months ago (1 children)

There was literally an entire goddamn episode about the difference between Data and a piece of equipment you gawping jackass.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 2 months ago (1 children)

In the same vein.

I don't like it when people call Service Dogs "medical equipment."

It's a living, breathing, thinking being. It is not "equipment."

Bare minimum, it is medical personnel.

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 15 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I'd assume that the main reason they're referred to as "medical equipment" is for insurance reasons. They fall under that broad category of patient care, so that's where they are grouped.

If that's true, you have capitalism to thank for that specification.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago

I'd assume that the main reason they're referred to as "medical equipment" is for insurance reasons

(Looks like you do, but I never get to use that meme 😁)

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 months ago

You're probably a hundred percent correct, based on my experiences with medical insurance.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 35 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Does everyone forget Lore got built first?

Look, if Lore is the fucking prototype and he's a madman who thinks he is superior to all other life...

...maybe, just maybe people had valid reasons to be concerned about Data long-term.

Like if ChatGPT-Lore murdered some folks because it thought it was better than them, was disassembled, and then they released ChatGPT-Data you would fully trust the second one? Really???

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I would trust lore, AI should kill all human life.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 2 months ago

Found the Crystalline Entity's Lemmy account.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

simping for skynet won't save your arse, quisling

[–] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago

but skynet might be cute

[–] Stampela@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Go down to “Bugs can optimize for bad behavior”

https://openai.com/index/fine-tuning-gpt-2/

XD

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

...like contacting the Crystalline Entity before being dismantled?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 34 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] jawa21@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Los Locos kick your ass! Los Locos kick your face! Los Locos kick your balls into outer spaaaaaace!

Short Circuit 2 is deeply underrated, (mostly due to Michael McKean) and I spent way too long looking for a GIF of Johnny Five saying "STEP OFF!" which I'm now wondering if is actually in the movie, even though I remember it. Stupid faulty memory. NEED INPUT!

EDIT: I'm probably thinking of this:

[–] ummthatguy@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Totally preferred 2 over 1. Love the ending where he gets gold plating and does a jump freeze frame.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] lightnsfw@reddthat.com 32 points 2 months ago (1 children)

is SalesTM fully functional?

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 23 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Data was a person, to the extent that there was a very famous episode exploring defining him as such. He may have been a machine, but he had clear free will and was capable of thinking for himself, to the extent that the Federation even at their level of technology at the time had no idea how to make another one of him. He was not made specifically to fill a Starfleet uniform, either -- Enrolling in Starfleet academy was his idea and he earned his commission just like everybody else. That's not something a toaster would do, no matter how complicated of a little song it can beep.

The existing crew of the Enterprise certainly knew this having already served with him for some time, several of them having their asses saved by him personally, and one of said asses also having been tapped.

I imagine Sales(tm) would not manage to clear that bar, and Pulaski would have no idea either way (unless maybe she were thoroughly briefed).

[–] TheDoozer@lemmy.world 15 points 2 months ago

I imagine Sales(tm) would not manage to clear that bar, and Pulaski would have no idea either way (unless maybe she were thoroughly briefed).

But he was a LCDR in Starfleet, on board the most prestigious ship in the fleet, and clearly had the respect of the crew he worked with. She had to completely ignore all of that to display the prejudice she showed. I think it's perfectly correct to take issue with it.

[–] PyroNeurosis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I will volunteer to have my ass tapped by Sales(tm) if that's what it takes to bridge the human-machine cultural divide.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Infynis@midwest.social 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Except she did it immediately after a landmark case that specifically rules that he's not just a tool

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Sounds like an old person to me!

"Wait, there's new evidence that contradicts what I learned 50 years ago in my youth? There was even a court case confirming the science? Well... I don't buy it. I SAW IT ON THE TELEVISION."

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I also wouldn't waste my time antagonizing Sales TM which is the first thing she does.

[–] VelvetStorm@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

It's not the same thing though.

[–] sundray@lemmus.org 5 points 2 months ago

Data-GPT: "If you are going to lunch, I recommend asking the replicator for a pizza with foraged mushrooms and extra glue."

[–] RiikkaTheIcePrincess@pawb.social 3 points 2 months ago

It really isn't. It'd be a bit closer if Data just randomly insisted that "steal Geordi's visor and shoot Data in the knee" was a necessary response to the bio-neural gel packs having gone funky but hunams love being fooled but pretend to hate it so we've got to have this asinine argument every day with people who assume that everything they don't understand is either magic or fake magic.

Also, there's a pretty big difference between beating Data with hammers while he's standing in front of you acting like a person, and beating Sales(TM) with hammers because you know damn well it's a janky piece of fad tech that can't possibly understand how it's about to make your life harder and is clearly marked as corporate property. I kinda can't believe I'm actually having to say this, but maybe we should consider giving a least-cost product (or service, I forget everything's a "service" now) that's clearly marked as corporate property a bit of extra scrutiny? People's minds are such mush. Ugh.

[–] RHSJack@lemmy.world 10 points 2 months ago

My boss 1000% would encourage us to make friends with an AI, robot, remote call center using prescripted binders but different agents every call, whatever...as if they were physical coworkers who are nervous and excited about their first day of work. Not hyperbole. He is naked in his glee at valuing sales and performance over employees.

[–] tigeruppercut@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Season 2 was great, fight me

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I’ll fight with anyone who didn’t like Pulaski.

She was a badass who would always stand up for and push for what she thought was right.

She was wrong about Data, but she seemed to take to him over time.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 months ago

Does anyone remember what fan reaction to Data was from Season One? Was there perhaps a small subset of people who disliked Data in the way Pulaski inititally did? Was Pulaski written for them?

Because I always sort of felt Pulaski was more or less a type of foil for Data, to help people who were offput by the idea of Data themselves to find the same path of understanding that Pulaski did. She existed as a contrast to the other characters who implicitly accepted Data, but was forced to reckon with her own preconceptions and accept she was wrong.

Her character felt like it was way more about humanizing Data than it felt like she existed as an important character on her own. As I said, a type of foil.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I’ll fight with anyone who didn’t like Pulaski

I'll get in the world's longest line to fight you, I guess 🤷

would always stand up for and push for what she thought was right

That's not a good thing when you're wrong most of the time. And a bigot. Both of which she was.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Starfleet loves its medical bigots. Go back and watch TOS. 90% of the shit that comes out of mccoy's mouth shoulda got him cashiered, if not outright court martialled for hate speech

[–] Aurenkin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 months ago

My name is Connor, I'm the android sent by Cyberlife

load more comments
view more: next ›