this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2024
147 points (96.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43945 readers
874 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] Melatonin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Buy-here-pay-here car dealers

Pawn shops

Payroll advance loans

Title loans

Private prisons

Bankruptcy-proof loans

Bankruptcy for corporations

Just spitballing here, feel free to add any I missed...

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] therealjcdenton@lemmy.zip 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] MxRemy@lemmy.one 4 points 4 months ago

I feel like my answer might break AskLemmy's rule 2 about "Overt Politics", but so do a lot of the other answers? Feel free to delete if so.

overtly political answer, also CW for violence.As far as the current American system goes... nothing. By and large, even laws that seem good are mostly only used in service of the elites, against the people. Consider this series of events:

  • In 2015 a white supremacist in South Carolina commits a mass shooting, killing 9 people.
  • In 2017, the Georgia state gov expands the state's domestic terrorism laws, directly in response to this shooting, because the previous version wouldn't have covered it.
  • In 2022, this expanded law gets used... against people protesting police brutality, who hurt no one, despite the fact that the cops killed one of them.

Unfortunately, this general sequence is not uncommon at all. Neither is the inverse, where the bureaucrats/judges/etc decide "that doesn't count, actually" when it comes to an elite very clearly breaking an existing law, or else changing the law so it doesn't apply to them in retrospect.

load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ