this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
150 points (86.1% liked)

World News

39099 readers
2145 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Aspartame is also linked in some studies to weight gain, GI disorders, mental health issues and more:

According to some studies, aspartame and other artificial sweeteners can lead to weight gain instead of weight loss 12. Aspartame has been linked to increased appetite, diabetes, metabolic derangement and obesity-related diseases 2.

One study showed that aspartame causes greater weight gain than a diet with the same calorie intake but no aspartame 1. Another study found that even acceptable daily intakes of aspartame might make you hungrier and lead to weight gain 3.

...some research suggests an association between aspartame intake and metabolic damage to the central nervous system (CNS), such as changes in enzyme and neurotransmitter activities 2. Aspartame acts as a chemical stressor by elevating plasma cortisol levels and causing the production of excess free radicals. High cortisol levels and excess free radicals may increase the brain’s vulnerability to oxidative stress which may have adverse effects on neurobehavioral health 3.

There is also some evidence that high-aspartame consumption may lead to weaker spatial orientation, irritability, depression, and other neurobehavioral conditions 14. However, these studies are limited in scope and further research is needed to determine the long-term effects of aspartame on human health.

Worth researching more, especially if you eat/drink anything with this stuff - and it's in a lot of food products.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NecoArcKbinAccount@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

wtf I literally had a diet coke for the first time in my life the other day, and this comes up? Am I gonna get cancer now???

[–] nevemsenki@kbin.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you don't die of something else first, you're probably gonna get cancer I'm afraid.

Ok but for real though I had my first diet coke a few days ago (don't drink soda that much) and now I see this.

[–] BlueN1te@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

In other news, blood Is red. Jk. In all seriousness we have known aspartame causes issues for awhile now

[–] Pookie1804@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm not sure because I think more studies need to be done.

What I do know is I never liked diet coke or anything with artificial sweeteners. Never drank them. But when I got cancer I craved it. During chemo it was the only thing I could drink without issue. So there's that.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] erre@feddit.win 1 points 1 year ago

Looks over at his Sweet N Low packets 😬

(I know, saccharin vs aspartame)

[–] Kerploppus@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Causes it, or possibly causes it? Seems like they should get their ducks in a row and find out conclusively?

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There is no "conclusively".

What do you mean by "causes cancer"? Do you mean "any quantity at all causes immediate cancer in all people"? Because nothing does. Do you mean "some quantity over any time period causes cancer in some people?" Because almost everything does (just ask California).

The latter is probably closer to what they mean. But we don't consume gallons of aspartame daily for 50 years.

So the real question is "what is the risk when consumed in realistic quantities?" And it turns out there is almost no risk.

[–] JesusTheCarpenter@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I am curious whether this will actually impact what is considered safe to consume on a daily basis.

Again, many things are unhealthy and carcinogenic in large quantities. The infamos study showed that Aspartame was causing cancer in mice but the amounts they were given would be like humans eating bags of it every day.

[–] notatoad@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For context, this is the same designation that bacon currently has, amongst a whole bunch of other things we all eat.

[–] MercuryUprising@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but bacon is probably like the unhealthiest meat you can eat. Its packed with sodium nitrites to retain its pink hue and is absolutely off the charts for actual sodium content as well as saturated fat, which makes up nearly 70% of its calories. If you were eating a 1kg pack of bacon the way I see people chugging a daily liter o cola, it would be incredibly unhealthy.

[–] stranger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I love being a human lab rat for capitalist America 🙆🏻‍♂️

[–] fennec@feddit.de 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hasn’t it already been proven to facilitate the development of Alzheimer? Honest question - I’m a layman in medicine and just worried about my dad chugging tons of diet products full of aspartame, thinking it’s the healthy choice (as opposed to non-diet lemonade for instance).

[–] nymwit@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I don't know enough to disqualify the studies they cite, but I guess at least these folks seem to be the opposite of industry shills? There is an Alzheimer's section. US Right to Know: Aspartame

The Alzheimer's Association (safely covering their asses) defers to the FDA's approval but does note concerns have been raised. it's myth 5 here

[–] CannaVet@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

America: nuh uh in fact aspartame gives you a 6 pack we just discovered

[–] SheenTStars@monyet.cc 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Artificial sweeteners always give me a headache after a certain amount. Now I know why.

[–] Pietrasagh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe ypu worry too much /unnecessarily snarky/... sorry ;-)

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

IDK why people are so determined to consume that shit.

[–] DigitalPortkey@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Because I like cold carbonated drinks, I like the taste of cola, but I don't like the thick, sugary, syrupy taste of actual Coke?

Surely you realize it's not because we have "aspartame cravings" or that we somehow think it's healthier (there's nothing healthy about Coke in any form anyway)...

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] kabat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I need my caffeine, but loathe the taste of coffee. So I drink tons of coke. If I drank the sugar variation, my size would be measured in football field units. With diet, I at least am not morbidly obese.

[–] danhasnolife@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So let's say we stop playing semantics to the degree of harm and say that aspartame is not good for humans. Ok. What sweetener currently on the market is the least damaging option for me to pursue?

[–] farsightxr20@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Feels like there are 2 classes of sweeteners:

  • Proven to be bad for your health
  • Not yet proven to be bad for your health

And whenever one in the second category becomes popular, it inevitably transitions to the first category.

[–] luffyuk@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Also, "proven" is a minefield these days. There are so many agents with so many agendas conducting these so-called medical studies. It's difficult to know what to trust. For example, for decades the sugar industry has been paying "scientists" to conduct dodgy studies into the effects of fat in your diet in an attempt to deflect from the true horrors of added sugar.

[–] Lazylazycat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Stevia, erythritol, xylitol.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›