this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
5 points (100.0% liked)

Selfhosted

40324 readers
556 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Hi,

I would like to use Wireguard over TCP. I'm trying to reach my server from a restrictive network and UDP is being blocked. TCP is not blocked in certain ports though, and I would like to open a VPN server that listen on those over TCP.

I'm using the wireguard Linuxserver docker image. Any suggestions?

Thanks.

top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] exu@feditown.com 3 points 1 year ago

Wireguard only supports UDP. The main reason being TCP over TCP is extremely slow.

You could try OpenVPN, I think that has a TCP mode though, as said, don't expect good performance.

[–] parmesancrabs@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

For my setup, I used UDP port 443. For the vast majority of situations it works well as TCP 443 is for secure internet traffic. It seems admins often blanket 443 port open regardless of protocol 🙃

[–] jr52@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Try UDP port 123 sometimes that goes through the firewalls

[–] bren42069@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 1 year ago