this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2023
45 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37740 readers
650 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Google's results have been getting worse over time, but it seems like the last couple years, they've taken a steep nose-dive, completely overrun with crappy content farming.

I've mitigated a lot of that by doing searches for any kind of product comparison or technical question with "site:reddit.com", but now with the possibility that that trick will become less useful over time as well...?

Yeah. What search engines are other tech folks using?

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShadyGrove@beehaw.org 24 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I personally like duck duck go, the results are generally pretty good, and if they aren't, it's easy to search on other engines using DDG's bangs. You just type "!g search term" and you can search on Google, and there's a bunch more, like !w for Wikipedia, !aur for the arch user repo etc etc

[–] s3rvant@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

+1 for DDG

And thank you for reminding about bangs

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How did I not know about that already? I've been on DDG for a years.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There are a lot of bangs as well.

Try !loblaws maple syrup as I see you're from Canada.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago

O damn! That's bound to come in handy.

[–] SatyrSack@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

And to see if there is a bang already for a website you use often, use !bang lemmy or whatever to see the list of !bangs for that site

[–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

It even has the Haskell docs lol

[–] yetAnotherUser@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The only issue I have with DDG is the news tab being filled to the brim with MSN.com. I get that DDG uses Bing search but it's still annoying having to put "-site:msn.com" behind your query every so often.

[–] tet42@ka.tet42.org 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I really like SearXNG for searching. It combines results from multiple search engines (that you define) and strips out advertisements. You can host your own SearXNG instance if you are in to self hosting, or you can use one of the many available public instances.

[–] jason@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

SearXNG has come a long way. I self-host, and I consistently get more reliable results than when I use Google, and you can set it to replace something like twitter.com with nitter.net or reddit.com with teddit.net, so you can still visit those sites automatically on mobile (not sure, but that might be a self-host only thing).

[–] Tandrios@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thank you for this! Never heard of SearXNG until this thread. Sounds promising if you can use these replacement sites.

[–] Lyrac@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the tip! Just set up my docker container. How do you configure the hostname replacements? In the UI Preferences menu, there's just a toggle switch for "Hostname Replace", but nowhere to input a list of names.

[–] dillydogg@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What are the privacy implications of you being the only person using an instance? I was under the impression that part of the privacy from SearXNG was by obfuscation because of many different people searching from the the same instance. I thought about self hosting it, but didn't want to share with the vps I pay for now.

[–] tet42@ka.tet42.org 1 points 1 year ago

I guess at the end of the day that I don't have many concerns for privacy. I am not searching for things that might get me on a watch list. Searching from my private instance is no more/less secure in terms of privacy than it would be if I did a Google search. The search endpoints (Google, Bing, DDG, etc) all know the IP that the search is coming from even if its passing through SearXNG first. So if I was doing something shady, I could easily be tracked down that way.

The main reason I run my own SearXNG is so I can strip ads and search multiple search providers from a single search.

[–] dinodrinkstea@beehaw.org 9 points 1 year ago

I use DuckDuckgo through Firefox. It's great and there are good extensions for extra safety. Also, Firefox deskopt is so customizable, i got a neon cityscape design for the bar!

[–] Nankeru@feddit.de 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Kagi, hands down, is by far the best search engine I've ever used (next to Neeva, which got bought and shut down).

Just simple searches like "Best gaming headphones" or "Realtek Driver Download" and comparing them with Google, Bing, DuckDuckGo, Brave, etc. shows how the quality of the results are far superior.

And you can directly define, which sites you'd like to see higher / more results of or less - or even completely block or pin them to the top.

Also, it also shows you directly, before visiting a site, in colors if a site has a very high number of ads and/or trackers.

Very satisfied with it, can only recommend.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I saw they charge, looked around a bit for how much, couldn't figure it out and noped out.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

It's not hard to find.. you click the big yellow "Sign Up" button and it will show you a price list

[–] Mustafaalbazy@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Does that means it's not a search engine by itself, but uses the indexes of other search engines and refine them?

[–] schnapsidee@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This looks pretty good, and I wouldn't mind paying for search, but it seems really pricy. I've never counted how many searches I do, but it's definitely more than 10 a day. $10 a month seems like a lot for just search...

[–] Nankeru@feddit.de 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Made me feel a little unwell at the beginning as well, but considering that the search is one of the main, key features o use daily, multiple times it is totally worth it.

I pay for a search engine, but:

  • High quality search results
  • No ads
  • High customizability
  • No weird SEO optimized Website results which help me not at all and I lose hours in a year clicking them by accident
  • Did I mention no ads or sponsored content?
[–] lovesyouandhugsyou@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I'm happy to pay it myself, as I find that with other engines I pay in frustration and time because the results have to support those who do pay: the advertisers. Much higher value in my daily life than e.g. a Netflix sub.

[–] higante@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

Ive been using duckduckgo for years. Ive had good results. I still call is google-fu though.

[–] Maddi@pawb.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’ve honestly thought about trying bing search with the new bing chat. It’s just a large change from searching now. It might be a good option thought for helping to curate answers more directly.

[–] SevYote@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you mean, curate answers more directly? I haven't really looked at bing recently.

[–] Maddi@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago

So with Bing chat, which is more or less ChatGPT (just a model made specifically for Microsoft), it has the ability to crawl the web and get information into one place. So if you ask for reviews of a product, it’s able to curate them and give summaries so you can get an overviews. Granted, it’s still in super early beta and will sometimes give bad information, but a bit of fact checking is doable. I’ve played around with it for a bit and it’s fascinating. It works pretty well too but it’s not always right since it’s an AI attempting to learn. Hopefully that all makes sense 😅

[–] gilbert31@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Duckduckgo, if I really can't find something relevant then I switch to Startpage.

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

DuckDuckGo.

Bangs are awesome, I set it as my browser bar search, and I can search for cheese discounts in my local supermarket with one search string.

Try it, type !appie kaas into DDG.

[–] circuitsunfish@plesiosaur.net 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@maynarkh @SevYote this post is how I learned that my supermarket is also bang searchable now. cheese for all!

[–] maynarkh@feddit.nl 1 points 1 year ago

Kaas voor iedereen inderdaad

Been using duckduckgo for years. At least for the type of content I'm usually searching for, mostly tech related stuff, it seems to me that it has always had great results.

[–] iByteABit@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 year ago

Duckduckgo usually, but if I want to be sure or I can't find something then Google

[–] vanderbilt@beehaw.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I primarily use Kagi, but I will fall back to DDG when I need to.

[–] SevYote@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What do you think of Kagi? What sorts of scenarios / search types do you find yourself needing to fall back to a different search engine?

[–] GlitzyArmrest@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Kagi is great, I never really need to fall back to anything else.

[–] raresbears@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

SearXNG personally

[–] dukethorion@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not enough people have said SearXNG yet, so hands down, SearXNG. You can change a lot of settings in the Docker code, so your settings are the default for anyone that uses it. If you prefer the actual default, you can save settings per browser with a local cookie.

thanks to this post, i'm trying out searxng and then kagi, neither of which i knew. hopefully there's a searx instance configured roughly to how i'd want. i'm not philosophically opposed to paying, but search is a delicate thing to be personally identifiable - and i don't care what your privacy policy is, if you're taking my money, you can connect me with my clicks

[–] ozoned@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

I completely forgot this existed. When I read your post yesterday I immediately went out and deployed it for myself and family. Works great, results seem on point so far. I'm already sold.

Thank you for the recommendation!

[–] girlfreddy@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

My go-to's are duckduckgo, Brave and Ghostery for searches.

I also have the Samsung internet app and Chrome, but only use them for gov't websites that block my go-to's.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Google with uBlock for mundane stuff like washing machine parts. Duckduckgo for anything I don't want Google knowing about and associating with my account.

[–] matejc@matejc.com 2 points 1 year ago

What search engine I use? All of them. I use Searxng.

[–] tubbadu@lemmy.one 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I use startpage, that returns the same results as google but keeping you private and with no annoying ads

[–] beejjorgensen@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

Startpage also appears to give me better results when I quote a search team than the other non-Google engines.

[–] Mustafaalbazy@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I use a mix of google, bing, duckduck and Yandex.

Also I have "DEVONagent Pro" which i use for academic research, it has many automation features and quite customisable, however it does take a bit of time to learn it.

Edit: I also use "HistoryHound" which basically search into the content of my browsing history, depending on the browser local cache. Excellent tool for academics/researchers.

[–] gaylord@lemmy.k6qw.com 1 points 1 year ago

I like using a selfhosted version of searxng

load more comments
view more: next ›