this post was submitted on 29 Dec 2023
747 points (98.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3128 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ZeroCool@slrpnk.net 200 points 10 months ago (3 children)

States that participate in the federal program are required to cover half of the administrative costs, which would cost Nebraska an estimated $300,000. Advocates of the program note that the administrative cost is far outweighed by the $18 million benefit, which the U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates would benefit 175,000 Nebraska children who might otherwise go hungry on some days during the summer.

Imagine being such a reprehensible monster that you'd let 175k children in your state starve rather than participate in a federal program that'd help feed them when school is out each summer. It's unconscionable.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 28 points 10 months ago

It's unconscionable

It's conservative.

[–] cultsuperstar@lemmy.world 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Remember, Republicans only care about fetuses. They don't care about babies and kids.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ersatz@infosec.pub 163 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

He doesn't believe in welfare... I see. But what about this welfare?

Pork processor partially owned by Pillen gets $25 million federal grant

Or what about the time he got got $7.8M in pandemic loans and only paid back 2/3 of it. The rest was forgiven. What about the hundreds of thousands he takes every year in federal subsidies? He seems to like that kind of welfare.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 101 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Fucker believes in welfare when it's called corn subsidies.

[–] crsu@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Loophole: Poor people must change their name to corn

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Itsamemario@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I think the best course of action would be to reframe their thinking, instead of allowing things to keep in being called subsidies, force them to try to clarify the difference between a subsidy and welfare. Ie, farming subsidy? You mean farming welfare. Banking subsidy? You mean banking welfare. Did you know that Boeing Corp has received $15 Billion in subsidies not paid back? You mean $15 Billion in welfare, they in fact, received nearly $75 Billion in welfare, most of that welfare being received since 2000, and of that ~$75 Billion in welfare received, they actually paid back ~$60 Billion. So they received $15 Billion dollars in welfare from the US taxpayers. They are by no means the sole corporate beneficiary of welfare from the taxpayers, just the first one I stumbled upon. Point being, force the language to reflect what they hate so their hypocrisy can be exposed and other people's eyes can be opened. Most people don't know exactly what a subsidy is, they think there is some sort of justification for it that makes it beyond criticizing, a subsidy is just welfare for corporations or farms to keep them in business, we want them in business, sure, but we also want kids to be able to eat over the summer, and if farms and Boeing and banks are deserving of welfare from the government, and hence from the US taxpayers, why aren't kids?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] havelock1869@lemmy.world 81 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But he’s okay with PPP loans being forgiven and also gets USDA subsidies for Pillen Family farms. Source: https://projects.propublica.org/coronavirus/bailouts/search?q=Pillen&v=1 Source:https://farm.ewg.org/persondetail.php?custnumber=A09760551

[–] Kosmokomeno@infosec.pub 14 points 10 months ago

Those entitled brats made a deal with the devil when they took the money. Greed got the better of them. It always does.

[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 72 points 10 months ago (2 children)

maybe if we called it a 'subsidy'. ha

subsidies for very profitable corporations: a-ok ! tax cuts for people with more money than they could ever actually spend: you betcha! the welfare jobs program we call 'the united states military': ha, no reductons there, ever!

human beings who need to eat food: go fuck yourself

the lack of empathy in the republican party is so stark its hard to fathom.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 22 points 10 months ago

Just need to get those little tykes their own LLCs and then they can have their lawyers file for federal aid!

[–] Ghostalmedia@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

They’d hate that too. Then GOP hates the word “subsidy” when it’s associated with something they don’t like. Example: subsidies for transitioning to green technology.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ME5SENGER_24@lemmy.world 64 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So no more federal funding for Nebraska??

If he doesn’t believe in welfare, surely he doesn’t believe in government aid or subsidies

That goes for every citizen of Nebraska, and if you don’t like it vote him out!

I’m tired of this fucking pissing contest between Republicans and people that care about others

[–] Hylactor@sopuli.xyz 9 points 10 months ago

I would very much appreciate if a wonk can swing in and layout all the subsidies this guy/Nebraska benefit from.

[–] books@lemmy.world 61 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Except to our farmers. Well subsidize the shit out of them.

[–] fne8w2ah@lemmy.world 20 points 10 months ago

Or even his "holy" rich supporters.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Shialac@lemmy.world 55 points 10 months ago (3 children)
[–] Chakravanti@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)

He is like Trump. He'll pretend to be whatever you want to believe as long as you give him money. Then he'll rape your kids.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.world 49 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Ohh, so when I say, "I don't believe in god" and you still force your Christian morality on me that's OK. When you "don't believe" in a real tangible thing that helps countless numbers of people you can just hand wave that away.

Good to know the douche bag demographic is still overly represented in every facet of American life.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

When these jerks talk about "freedom", they don't mean it in the sense that normal people think about it. Normal people think freedom means that I, as a free citizen in a secular nation, can ignore the xtian cult's demands on what I'm required to do if I so wish, but governments (local and federal) may seek to provide services for their citizens.

For them, "freedom" means they get to dictate that everyone bend the knee to their little book club and other people's kids starve so that taxes are as low as possible (for the rich - regressive taxes on the poor and middle class can be high AF).

[–] qwertyWarlord@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So... He wouldn't mind if the government withholds any financial aid to the state from now on, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Bransons404@lemmy.world 43 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The sadder part of this is that $40 can hardly feed anyone for a week, and that's if you REALY stretch it on bulk rice and beans.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@startrek.website 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

It's worse than that.

It's $40/month, and only for the 3 months of summer to make up for impoverished children not getting meals through school during the summer.

These people are ghouls.

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

And its only administrative costs: the federal government would be paying for the program. He doesn’t want to pay for someone to coordinate and do the paperwork for someone else to feed his state’s disadvantaged program. He doesn’t want to pay for someone to run a program to bring like 50 times the spending into his state

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So he pays for his campaign out of his own pocket? He doesn't collect donations. Surely.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago

If you don’t believe in a problem, it simply goes away /s

[–] grte@lemmy.ca 36 points 10 months ago
[–] BigDanishGuy@sh.itjust.works 34 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I see he also self identifies as a Christian... I'm not one to judge, but I once read that countries with the word "democratic" in their names seldom were.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Itsamemario@lemmy.world 34 points 10 months ago

The way that he is opting out is by refusing to spend the ~$300k that is the federal government's requirement to be part of the grant program. I wonder if it would be possible to do an end run around that waste of oxygen, and have a charity raise the ~$300k and accept the $18m the federal government is offering, to be distributed by the charity instead...

[–] hperrin@lemmy.world 33 points 10 months ago

“I don’t believe in welfare*.”

* for the poor

[–] danc4498@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago (1 children)

The rich get bailouts, the poor get welfare

[–] Powerpoint@lemmy.ca 27 points 10 months ago

Not in the USA. The rich get both. The poor get nothing.

[–] rayyy@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago

He spent more money sending troops to the border as a publicity stunt. Blaming the poor has always been an effective tactic to divert attention away from their groveling to the wealthy.

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I hope he doesn’t have children.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago (2 children)

He has four children and seven grandchildren. Source

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FrankTheHealer@lemmy.world 19 points 10 months ago

Sounds like a real swell guy.

[–] Nougat@kbin.social 16 points 10 months ago

Yeah! Those children should stop being so lazy and go get jobs! Damn children, depending on other people for their well-being.

[–] F_Haxhausen@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If he doesn’t believe in giving low income families a meager 40$ a month “welfare” then he should reject the saving Grace that is given from Jesus.

The point of the Gospels of Jesus is that the we are saved ONLY because of the Grace of God, and NOT because of our good works. PERIOD.

Nothing we do gets us the Grace of God. We can’t DO anything to deserve it. It is just given.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] theodewere@kbin.social 12 points 10 months ago

i'll bet he can turn right around and say he's a Christian with a straight face, too

[–] Mango@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

This exact post came up yesterday except with Iowa. Wtf is going on?

[–] pozbo@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Something tells me this guy is about to learn about all the poor Iowa residents who don't believe in letting piece of shit politicians continue to breathe.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BrisvegasLukass@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago

What a complete fuckhead. Love Australia.

[–] yuriy@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Random fellow in Nebraska here, it’s a depressing place to live if you’re not a staunch republican!

People say Lincoln and Omaha are pretty okay, but I suspect that’s just in comparison to the rest of the state.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 9 points 10 months ago

Breaking: "my home state continues to fall into the neo-conservative hell portal"

load more comments
view more: next ›