this post was submitted on 16 Nov 2023
201 points (92.4% liked)

Games

32654 readers
1966 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I made this game with a friend. We're interested in your feedback!

(page 3) 21 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snooggums@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Apparently a microwave is bigger than a dog!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Ethalis@jlai.lu 1 points 1 year ago

Pretty cool game, didn't manage to find the answer in 20 questions though

[–] Grass@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Some responses seemed iffy but I'd play again.

[–] jack@monero.town 0 points 1 year ago

It would be great if you could open source it

[–] Frogster8@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Think it's broken, I asked it

"is it under 6 letters" "is it less than 6 letters"

And it shrugged both times

[–] stoned_ape@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago

Word was a seahorse. I narrowed it down to saltwater fish and asked if it had teeth and it replied thumbs up. Seahorse doesn't have teeth, son

[–] austinfloyd@ttrpg.network -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It is interesting, but with weird quirks.

It is definitely capable of responding with 🤷‍♂️, but neglects to do so in some expected areas.

"does it use a microprocessor?" 👍 "was it invented before 1970?" 👍

These are somewhat contradictory. No microwave in 1946-1971 could have had a microprocessor. If the answer is "sometimes yes, sometimes no" then 🤷‍♂️ is probably best.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›