this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
346 points (97.8% liked)

World News

39099 readers
2086 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] JoeKrogan@lemmy.world 195 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'm sure this will sit well with the Muslim population of France. Pro Palestine is not pro hamas nor is it antisemitic.

[–] yumpsuit@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago

They sure are strutting right up to the reigning world champions of effective street protest and sticking their chins out, aren’t they?

(Your username makes me hear the Mass Effect 3 multiplayer Krogan blood rage laugh, by the way)

[–] febra@lemmy.world 181 points 1 year ago

I'm part jewish, european, anti hamas, pro palestine. Why wouldn't I be allowed to show my support for Palestine? Israel is trying to starve out two million people with a siege and I am not allowed to say anything about it?

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 136 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (14 children)

The government of France bans protests... I've heard that one before I think. What did the French do after?

[–] formergijoe@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Hadriscus@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

We beheaded the cake

[–] thrawn@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

Every government seems to know the people won’t actually do that anymore. Peaceful protest was encouraged when the alternative was violence, but now that it’s not, it can be safely banned. The French are ironically a great example— they are notorious for their protests and revolution, yet when the government ignored them and raised retirement age, nothing happened.

I’m not saying this is good or bad, nor calling for action. It’s merely an observation. I further observe that perhaps this is the humanity tamed enough for governments to once again put the people last, but with the firepower to enforce it eternally. We need good people seeking public office to prevent this, and other solutions.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] charonn0@startrek.website 132 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Regardless of where you stand on the Israel/Hammas situation, the state shouldn't have this kind of power.

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

France does this because of Charlie Hebdo.

The US didn’t even do this over 9/11.

[–] WhiteHawk@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Tbf there weren't a lot of pro-Al Qaeda protests in the US after 9/11

[–] joneskind@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The French government fears unrest. Protests in France are not peaceful, and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict is a highly sensitive subject.

I have been on the Palestine side since the beginning of its violent colonisation, but the Hamas attacked civilians, not warriors. It was an act of pure terrorism. Very reminiscent of the events in France on November 13, 2015, when terrorists attacked concert-goers at the Bataclan.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

If it were truly about "unrest", they'd ban demonstrations in support of Israel also. This is just the government telling people what opinions they're allowed to express.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] RubberStuntBaby@kbin.social 63 points 1 year ago

What about anti-Israel protests, are those still allowed?

[–] gamermanh@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 1 year ago

Damn, France taking an L on this one

[–] scarabic@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I’m sorry, France. You are straight up Islamophobic. Go fuck yourselves.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] fosforus@sopuli.xyz 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Pro-Russia protests were just fine though even though the methods of murdering in Ukraine are not that different.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Were there many pro Russia protests in France?

[–] CallateLoSico@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Disgusting racists and fascists

[–] Fedizen@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Why is like 100% of western media doing this shit rather than discussing imposing real trade restrictions on Israel. (also wtf do all these simps fucking love saudi arabia?)

[–] tycho@lemmy.sdf.org 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

France is making a large part of its own defense system (fighter jet, navy ships, etc.) and for it to be financially viable, sells some models to other countries. One very good client is Saudi Arabia. You will never hear criticism from this government against Saudis.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deft@ttrpg.network 16 points 1 year ago

$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$

[–] iByteABit@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

If you thought any measures taken for Ukraine were because of morals you're very mistaken

[–] mycatiskai@lemmy.one 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Time to protest for free croissants. Two bread solution

Just pick a ridiculous thing to protest against but know that what they are actually protesting is for a free Palestine and a peaceful solution that allows both Israeli and Palestinian people to live without the fear and death they currently deal with.

[–] erranto@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't now how do we still consider France a democracy . Controlling public opinion by banning protests and controlling the narrative through billionaires' owned media, isn't what comes to my mind when thinking about democracy, reducing it to the freedom to choosing representatives is a slippery slope towards authoritarianism

[–] jarfil@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Sounds like the same way we still consider the US a democracy.

[–] jcdenton@lemy.lol 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good intentions as there's a lot of antisemitism from outside viewers, but it doesn't set a good precedent.

[–] Lols@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

the good intentions are a pretense at best, the french governmenr is perfectly aware that criticism of zionism is not antisemitism

they dont want jewish folks to feel safe, they want palestinians to feel unsafe

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago

They want protesters to feel unsafe. The French government is getting sick and tired of the French national hobby, and are trying to quash the population. Thankfully the French people are absolutely incorrigible, and will continue their favorite pasttime in defiance of silly authoritarians

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Does France have free speech protections? Seems like this would be unconstitutional in the US, but not sure what laws exist there.

[–] erranto@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They have freedom of the press, but no freedom of speech they way it is guaranteed through the US constitution. in fact they have laws against hate speech and antisemitism.

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Interesting, it would seem one can support a Palestinian state and oppose retaliation against innocent Palestinian civilians for the actions of an extremist group without being engaged in hate speech or antisemitism, however much the west really struggles with this concept.

[–] jnplch@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 1 year ago

Because it’s a stick to beat Muslim citizens with. It’s what all conservative French governments have been doing for the last 15 years, more or less openly depending on Le Pen’s (father or daughter) polling numbers. Darmanin is about as anti-Muslim pro-police-state as they come.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

"Freedom of speech" as it's known in the US is slightly misnamed. It's more accurately "freedom from government regulation of speech", and the EU doesn't really have the same protections.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hiddengoat@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They have a lot of things that can be set on fire. That's a form of free speech protection.

[–] Cryophilia@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

More importantly, they have a police force that won't massacre protesters.

[–] ArmokGoB@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They shelled our peaceful protest in southern California with tear gas mortars. Peaceful protest isn't even de facto legal in the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SHITPOSTING_ACCOUNT@feddit.de 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most European countries do have free speech protections, but with much more limitations than in the US. (IIRC the US would also not allow e.g. speech calling for a lynch mob, as long as it's specific enough.)

Various forms of hate speech, including support for terrorist organizations, are covered by those. Terrorist usually isn't just what the government dislikes; it usually requires (or is subject to review by) a court decision.

There are obvious arguments against such rules, but there are very few social benefits to letting people support literal child murdering terrorists, call for the lynching of certain groups of people, claim that the Holocaust never happened and should be repeated (sic), or just march up and down the street in Nazi uniforms showing off their right arms much to the dismay of any survivors, their descendants, and the people who would be next on the list.

The main risk is the government abusing its power to ban all anti-government protests. Europe has decided that this risk is small enough with all checks and balances in place to be worth the social benefit. The US has decided otherwise.

[–] mwguy@infosec.pub 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

IIRC the US would also not allow e.g. speech calling for a lynch mob, as long as it's specific enough.

Participation in a lynvh mob is illegal, but calling for one I don't believe has been tested in court and would likely not pass judicial review (IANAL).

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›