this post was submitted on 07 Sep 2023
1646 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3352 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

What an utter piece of shit.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 393 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Can we start treating billionaires as rogue nations unto themselves? Because that's frankly how they act.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 130 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think technically they're more "terrorists" than "rogue nations"

[–] mx_smith@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I mean 9/11 was performed by some rich family member.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Hazdaz@lemmy.world 43 points 1 year ago

Frankly I am mad that people are only seeing this now.

Between billionaires and trillion dollar companies, many of them are richer than most nations.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 229 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (23 children)

Is this not treason? Like legitimately, technically.

[–] charonn0@startrek.website 174 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It may be a violation of the Logan Act, which makes it illegal for private citizens to interfere with foreign relations.

[–] DarthBueller@lemmy.world 100 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (6 children)

The Logan Act deals with private citizens negotiating with foreign governments. Unless he fucked with Starlink at the direct request of the Russian gov't, I don't see how the Logan Act applies. EDIT: apparently he did it after speaking with Russian government officials. So never mind, Logan Act is absolutely implicated.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] orclev@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Against Ukraine certainly, but since he's not a citizen of Ukraine, then no. If these were US forces that he sabotaged, or the US was actually fighting in the war then it would also qualify, but once again that doesn't apply. It definitely runs counter to US foreign interests, but that's not enough to qualify (and probably good it doesn't, a LOT of stuff people regularly do it could be argued would run counter to US foreign interests).

[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 68 points 1 year ago (13 children)

He did this with federal funds. And the US hasn’t declared war since, what, WW2? The Rosenbergs were executed for treason, and we never declared war with USSR.

[–] Jordan117@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The Rosenbergs were executed for treason

Espionage, actually.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (21 replies)
[–] BeautifulMind@lemmy.world 208 points 1 year ago (22 children)

It's cute how if Ukraine fights back that risks nuclear war, but when Russia invades a sovereign country it doesn't

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] taranasus@lemmy.world 174 points 1 year ago (14 children)

Hang on... That's sabotage. Straight up. That's a criminal offence no?

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 62 points 1 year ago

Yes. Assisting putler's genocide against Ukrainian children is a war crime.

[–] SoleInvictus@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Yep, but he's rich. I fully expect nothing to happen.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
[–] iyaerP@lemmy.world 150 points 1 year ago (10 children)

If he loves Russia so much, we should deport him there, and nationalize all his assets since SpaceX is a critical security apparatus and he's clearly the foreign agent of a hostile power.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Hiccup@lemmy.dbzer0.com 149 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Elon is not the president, a leader, the military, nor a government. This parasite should be in a prison or a brig at the very least. This is fucking treason.

[–] Arsenal4ever@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He controls 10K satellites, the electric car charging infrastructure, and a massive global communications platform. He's too big to control. Good thing we hero-worshipped him for years. 🫢 🤭

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 69 points 1 year ago (3 children)

He doesn't personally control any of that. Each of those organizations could continue on without him, probably happier to be rid of him.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 45 points 1 year ago

Yep. It's always good to remind everyone that he didn't build anything, nor did he found Tesla.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 134 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (51 children)

Fucking charge him with something. This is insane... If it's not treason, it sure as hell is undermining the billions of dollars in aid were sending Ukraine. We've sent 76 billion dollars so far.

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 82 points 1 year ago (21 children)

Yeah, if an unelected CEO can tell a democratically elected government what it can and can't do we're no better than medieval peasants who had to bow and scrape for the nobles' favor

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (50 replies)
[–] IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world 110 points 1 year ago (24 children)

I know it's an anathema to most in the US but the government needs to step up and take Starlink and Space X off Musk for a fair price. He's way too unstable to be trusted with tech that important.

[–] Hegar@kbin.social 78 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

A fair price would be musk in jail for his crimes.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The older I get the more socialist I am. Yeah, take it away from his dumb ass, but don't keep it ffs. Make it employee owned. Make every business employee owned.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] krayj@sh.itjust.works 97 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Any system capable of manipulating the outcomes of international conflict needs to become property of the government via eminent domain...especially if that system is used...especially if used by an entrepreneur operating without oversight.

[–] thann@lemmy.world 40 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Deactivating US military hardware in the middle of a conflict sounds a lot like an act of treason...

load more comments (16 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] YeetPics@mander.xyz 94 points 1 year ago (9 children)

I mean if a person does anything directly affecting a war (for any side) I'd say that person is a wartime volunteer.

Wartime volunteers that have taken up arms are a absolutely viable target for military strikes.

Just saying 🤷‍♂️

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] Coreidan@lemmy.world 72 points 1 year ago

Elon is a Russian bitch just like the rest of the billionaires.

[–] atyaz@reddthat.com 63 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It seems like privatization is working out great for us 👍

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 62 points 1 year ago

If true, my respect for Musk just dropped a .... well, none at all. It would be totally in character.

[–] muzzle@lemm.ee 54 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

But the truly galaxy brain move is in this article:

After CNN’s reporting, Musk reversed course, tweeting “the hell with it … we’ll just keep funding Ukraine govt for free.”

Gwynne Shotwell, Musk’s president at SpaceX, was livid at Musk’s reversal, according to Isaacson.

“The Pentagon had a $145 million check ready to hand to me, literally,” Isaacson quotes Shotwell as saying. “Then Elon succumbed to the bullshit on Twitter and to the haters at the Pentagon who leaked the story.”

[–] BioDriver@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Yeah we keep finding out more and more ways this mofo sucks. Somebody needs to strap him to the front of his stupid rocket and launch him into orbit.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 53 points 1 year ago

Muskovite belongs in prison with the other russian war criminals.

[–] Red_October@lemmy.world 52 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Make sure to save this for the next time that shitbird or one of his moron suckups tries to say he helped Ukraine. Fucker oughtta be treated the same as any Russian collaborator.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] blazera@kbin.social 49 points 1 year ago (2 children)

From the moment he gutted 80% of twitter staff very soon after a secret meeting with Putin, its all been pretty obvious Musk is a Russian asset. Twitter helped rally international support for Ukraine and he hasnt been subtle in sabotaging it

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Venomnik0@lemm.ee 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“Starlink was not meant to be involved in wars. It was so people can watch Netflix and chill and get online for school and do good peaceful things, not drone strikes.”

Yes my satellite that is actively being used in a war should be designed only for Netflix and chill.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Yepthatsme@kbin.social 41 points 1 year ago

Throw that fuck in prison and nationalize all his shit.

[–] PeckerBrown@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago

Fuck you, Elon - you festering vomit of a man.

[–] Grant_M@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Musk is a war criminal. This is a crime against humanity.

[–] Harrison@ttrpg.network 103 points 1 year ago (8 children)

It's neither of those things. Words have meanings, and legal terms have very specific meanings.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (4 children)

He sould absolutely be in prison. He interfered with a military conflict.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›