I thought it was great, and I'm glad I have only picked it up recently. Games like Inside are the reason why I think comparing games only makes sense to a limited degree. It's a great game, very inquire, soooo enjoyable. But it's also short, and that's probably a good thing? Is it better than TOTK? I wouldn't even know where to start on that question. It's not worse, it's just different.
this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2023
42 points (100.0% liked)
Gaming
30579 readers
663 users here now
From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!
Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.
See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The same conversation Limbo started to kick off when they released that back in the day. Quite short, but when you enjoy each moment that much, how can you attempt to assign a dollar to hour value? You just can't always diminish it to something that simple.
In terms of saying whether it's "the best of all time", well, it could certainly be one of the best of all time, but you really can't put it in front of or beside games doing radically different things. Youd have to start making a few wide umbrellas of games to place together and then rank them from there. Perhaps something like Unravel would be more comparable with something like Inside or Limbo.
I’d argue it’s worse than TOTK. I completely get your point that they’re wildly different, but INSIDE doesn’t feel as overall “fun” to me at any point as BOTW or TOTK. I think there was only one real flaw with INSIDE; the way in which you solve puzzles can be sort of tedious. One thing I really liked about The Witness was that, despite the fact that some things were hidden or convoluted, it was rarely a stupid long walk just to complete the puzzle. INSIDE featured that a number of times. Sometimes the puzzle’s solution was obvious, but I was still running around for minutes just doing the legwork. I feel there should be instant gratification for the puzzle’s solutions, sometimes solving them didn’t even feel good because I had spent too long trying to actually get the game to recognize I had completed the puzzle even though I had figured it out
I liked the story, it really drove the game forward but the gameplay was repetitive fast. I got old of it far quicker than I did when I played limbo.
Comparing games is like comparing movies. I think for the most part it works when you compare segments and styles rather than just whole games. Like I felt portal while also a short one mechanic game, that mechanic had a less tedious feeling towards the end. Probably due to the uniqueness of the mechanic at the time.
INSIDE was easier than LIMBO, but a worthy spiritual successor. Very good in the genres of puzzle platformer and horror. No cheap tricks, just good work all the way through.
The story is VERY open ended, and I felt a little slighted at first, but it grew on me. As far as very open ended stories, so was LIMBO's.
Really? I feel like 90% of it was just plowing ahead to realize what something does because the game wasn't clear in the answer. Like I'm inside death is required to figure out what you need to do. Even if it's not death it's going forward, pressing a button, realizing you aren't supposed to press the button and going back to press it again.
Honestly the biggest issue is the player verbs aren't clear. There was one point that you have to hide behind a box but the game has never had that mechanic so you have no clue you can even do it. The game will respawn you hiding behind the box to explain the mechanic to you. So that's essentially one place of forced death but there are dozens of examples of information you get the best after death.
I'm going to be the voice of dissension. I absolutely adored Limbo and bought Inside day one solely because of it. But Inside just didn't hook me like Limbo did. Inside was perfectly fine but I never gave it a second thought once I finished it, unlike Limbo.
I played it a while back and it's one of my favorite games. The sound design is top tier.
For me it was amazing. I felt that the 2.5 D was the best implementation of this type of mechanic I had ever seen. The way stuff from behind the environment comes into the 2D plain and interacts with the player is awesome. Extremely polished, very well animated, amazing visual tone, great atmosphere. Great semi scripted sequences, fantastic setpieces and (for me) an incredible ending (though disturbing).
How did you feel about the alternative ending?
TIL it has an alternative ending. I'll look it up later!
INSIDE was cool and I enjoyed it, but I wouldn't say it's a game of the year by long shot. Although I guess that depends on what else was released in the year of 2016. For me it was a better experience than most AAA games, at least.
To put it in perspective, Uncharted 4: A Thief's End was also in 2016 and also won a lot of Game of the Year awards. Other contenders are Hitman 2016, Overwatch, Doom, Firewatch, Dark Souls 3, The Witness, and Superhot.
One of my favourite games of all time. I forced my friend to sit and play it one night! I can't wait for whatever they are doing next.
It excelled as a pass and play game, not too many of those about these days. Good for an evening of exploring spooky shit with a friend.
It was alright. I feel like if it released at the same time limbo did, I would have enjoyed it more.
Really interesting and cool. I enjoyed my time, though it's a short game. Game of the year... I dunno about that though lol. It wasn't life changing or anything.