this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2023
653 points (94.2% liked)

Memes

45725 readers
1025 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 69 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure if Bitcoin had the largest and most powerful military in the world it would have become the world reserve currency by now

[–] gonzo0815@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

No because currency with built-in deflation is a bad idea. It would get scrapped very quickly.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)

Bitcoin: 4.7% believed to be in the hands of a single person, another 3.1% in the hands of four addresses. Deflatory so no incentive to use it to make transactions. Value depends on the network effect (i.e. a pyramid scheme). Small transactions now too expensive to be realistic. 24% of the supply was created in the first year, 35% over two years. Movement of funds takes too long to be useful. Those who got in early are guaranteed to be richer than those who got in late without having made any effort...

Crypto would be great as a replacement of the stockmarket but it's fighting to be cash instead and it's doing a bad job of it because it's can as envisioned by tech bros, not actual economists.

[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Also wastes energy and hardware (which includes rare earth metals mined by slaves) to endlessly compute hashes. Great solution for a post climate change world let me tell ya!

[–] explodicle@local106.com 2 points 1 year ago

Since nobody else responded to the stock market argument: it's how cash is envisioned to work by Austrian school economists, not the economists currently in charge. The average person needing to trust strangers with their money is not good.

It's an entirely different perspective on how money should work (that was de facto illegal for decades), and only now can we put our money where our mouths are.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Zithero@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's funny because thia just proves the metrics used to measure a Cryptos "Viability" apparently have nothing to do with its actual value.

What matters is it's trading power... Not it's circulation or 'Supoly Cap'

[–] itsmect@monero.town 3 points 1 year ago

fully agree

[–] ninjan@lemmy.mildgrim.com 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Though great privacy when used offline, which is also pretty sick and the adoption levels defies reason, it's virtually usable globally both online and offline.

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Bank notes have unique identifier allowing the government to track the path of your money. Privacy is dead

[–] RealJoL@feddit.de 19 points 1 year ago (19 children)

That also assumes every bill you use will be immediately returned to a bank. You'd have no way of knowing where money comes from and belongs to after one hop. Just make a purchase at the supermarket to exchange a 50 for 45 and you've got anonymous cash.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] Pinklink@lemm.ee 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s why I roam the streets trading bills with strangers

[–] Mubelotix@jlai.lu 11 points 1 year ago

Chad behavior

[–] jabberati@social.anoxinon.de 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

@ninjan @mod_pp Globally offline? In the US and maybe in some countries that don't have a stable currency on their own. Anywhere else you can't use it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HiddenLayer5@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

Hmm, perhaps both are but symptoms of the greatest scam: capitalism.

[–] Mordachai_Shedbacon@lemm.ee 16 points 1 year ago (15 children)

Why is the US printing so much money?

[–] Astroturfed@lemmy.world 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Paper money is flimsy and wears down quickly. It's being constantly printed and replaced. This meme is vague and intentionally misleading. Physical money in circulation is replaced and old money destroyed. Constantly. That's what these figures are about. The wealth inequality, solid point. The rest is just vague word use to make it sound alarming.

[–] itsmect@monero.town 13 points 1 year ago

Simple answer: Because they can, because it's lucrative, and because it's not as obvious as raising taxes. Imagine you could legally print money, and when anyones asks about it, you can just dismiss it with: "I'm stimulating the economy"

[–] Ubermeisters@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

Got to keep the printer people in business

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] explodicle@local106.com 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Surely it's collapsed since this meme was made 10 years ago.

[–] electriccars@startrek.website 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (17 children)

By over 30%:

Source: in2013dollars.com

Meanwhile...

$1000 would've bought 7.388 BTC in August 2013.

7.388 BTC today is worth... $193,186.08

Tell me again which one is the best place to store value?

Edit: Downvoted for showing facts. Not surprised.

[–] msage@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] kitonthenet@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

We live in a society

load more comments
view more: next ›