this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
1024 points (98.0% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5279 readers
882 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world.  About 1C of total warming.  Second chart:  about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability.  Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases.  About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ApexHunter@lemmy.ml 39 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

This xkcd is what finally resolved the "is it us or natural variation" question for me: https://xkcd.com/1732/

[–] Asimo@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's always the rate of change.

I remember a few years ago people arguing the temperatures have changed before and that theres billions spent on climate change and it's all propaganda.

They wouldn't listen to the rate of change argument then or acknowledge the trillions spent in industries causing climate change. I'm not sure they've changed their minds still ( I refused to engage them any further) but this is the challenge - so many people believe what they want to believe and don't want the hard truth.

[–] SuddenDownpour@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot of people love rationalising their own beliefs but hate reasoning out what's right and wrong. It makes me lose faith in humanity.

[–] emptyother@programming.dev 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A lot? We all need to be aware that we are able to hold on to faulty beliefs. We are only human.

Especially now with the amount of fake news

[–] Kage520@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

The Inconvenient Truth. That was so aptly named. Humans will do anything for the sake of convenience and climate change is quite inconvenient. Maybe if we make burning up the planet MORE inconvenient then it will change. Ridiculous taxes for carbon output sounds nice. Those tax dollars then spent on cloud seeding for the short term and carbon capture for the long term.

[–] 011010101010010@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

God bless Randall Munroe

[–] Nonameuser678@aussie.zone 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We've entered the 'this is the new normal now, get used to it' phase.

[–] OneWomanCreamTeam@sh.itjust.works 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"climate change is real, but it's too late so why change anything now?"

[–] Sharkwellington@lemmy.one 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe we should do something about it but there's nothing we can do.

I notice more and more people trying to push us into stage 4 - "Maybe there was something we could have done but it's too late now" - just so we can put all of the uncomfortable guilt behind us.

[–] BurnTheRight@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When there is no way to stop it, then the only thing left to do is exact brutal justice on the ones most responsible.

[–] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If a group of college students in 1985 could make a highly-trained riot police force cry "FALL BACK! FALL BACK!" with shit in their pants and the fear of God in their eyes, all because the construction of an airport was screwing over a small farming community a bit east of Tokyo... Then one can only imagine what the entire fucking world could do in retribution of its own destruction, to a group of inhumane ghouls who could all comfortably fit on a single Boeing 747.

They try to divide us with negacionist agenda

[–] JadenSmith@sh.itjust.works 22 points 1 year ago

This meme forgot to include when BP started pushing the 'Carbon Footprint' propaganda, to offset blame from corporations onto regular folk.

[–] DessertStorms@kbin.social 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Don't disagree with this at all, just noting that the start of that line could be stretched much further back, we have known that human consumption of coal was having/would have a detrimental impact on climate for well over 100 years 1856, 1902, 1912
source

Sadly in that timeline, profit has always mattered more than humanity (or the planet).

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 1 year ago

Still does.

[–] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 year ago

Stage 1: "Climate change is my responsibility to fix as an average citizen!"

Stage 2: "Actually, fixing climate change is the responsibility of the megacorporations responsible for it."

Stage 3: "Climate change is my responsibility to fix as an average citizen!" (said while researching sabotage and mutual aid)

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 16 points 1 year ago

Except instead of oops it's 'the world is going to end anyway, so why not burn more oil?'

[–] rustyricotta@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The mastermind behind all this must be building fallout vault-like structures to allow people to survive the planet when all is said and done. They will rule the world in the end, perform experiments, whatever they want.

[–] dudinax@programming.dev 11 points 1 year ago

The timeline for the earth to cool back off is a hundred thousand years. A bit too long to wait out in a bunker.

[–] lunarul@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I actually got a long ad on YouTube recently for luxury bunkers equipped with everything to go on for decades no matter what's going on outside. So yeah, that's a business now.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

What the hell is a luxury bunker?

Gold plated vault doors? Red carpet? Fancy mini bar soaps?

[–] PeepinGoodArgs@reddthat.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lol. You think don't deny climate change today? Hawaii was bound to burn, and it had nothing to with climate change. (Just read the headline...)

They are going to kill us while trying to rob us of the vocabulary that explains how and why.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Now we're in the "take your Xanax while daddy Bill Gates fixes everything for you" phase.

[–] nasi_goreng@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

I literally never heard that at all. Maybe it's American thing?

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

What really sucks is that we are penalizing newer, greener technologies in order to prop up older non-profitable technologies.

There is a huge subsidy in the US for coal power plants. That needs to wind down, preferably in the next 4 years.

A few states charge higher registration fees for hybrid and electric vehicles, while at the same time suppressing or almost eliminating the gas tax during post-pandemic inflation.

Certain groups are dead set on boiling the the frog here, without even realizing that they are a lobster in the same pot of water.

[–] JeffCraig@citizensgaming.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The worst part is that renewables and EVs are generally just better in every way.

Just because they don't go vroom vroom, a majority of the population don't like them.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Inb4 some idiot goes "but it takes metal mined from places and shipped across the ocean to make Teslas!!!"

Like your Ford Raptor is sustainably grown and harvested in small-plot ecologically friendly mom and pop truck farms....

[–] TheLobotomist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] shitescalates@midwest.social 8 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Missing section: "OK its real and man made, but the fix is too inconvenient"

[–] cerement@slrpnk.net 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“This is because you didn’t recycle enough!”

[–] fear@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I'll admit it, it was me. I mixed my paper with plastic. Sorry everyone.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

You doomed us! DOOMED!

Won't someone please just once consider the profits

Stuck in traffic huffing Exxon's fumes.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] TheLobotomist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It took me a while to get this

[–] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I still don't get it. Can you explain?

[–] TheLobotomist@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Erika2rsis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Alright, evidently sometimes a joke is still really funny even when you have to explain it!

[–] demlet@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

My personal human timeline:

  • End of dark ages up to industrial revolution: Wow, people are getting pretty dang smart, things are looking good for humanity.

  • Industrial revolution up to present: Well, on second thought...

[–] name_NULL111653@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago

I don't care if it is caused by humans or natural causes ( and it's likely both). The issue is that it's a problem, because we've evolved to live in a cool environment (relative to wherever this is going). Part of responsibly using this planet we find ourselves on is terraforming it to sustainably and efficiently suit our needs. I support decarbonization because it helps. But due to other natural factors effecting our environment for the worse (as far as we as a species are concerned), we will need to take more artificial measures to cool the planet in the future.

But the first step is decarbonization. We have two choices - accept natural inefficiencies and extreme conditions, and slowly lose our intelligence in exchange for resilience (evolutionary "crabification"), or terraform the planet to a constant, efficient environment to continue developing as an intelligence.

We are caught, environmentally, in a neutral zone between extreme fluctuations that will continue until the earth cools entirely from its formation. We did not exist during the last extreme. And if we do not prevent the next, our species will not survive.

[–] Depress_Mode@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No, this timeline started with “Shit, our calculations show that we might ruin the world in just a few decades at this rate. Oh, well. Probably best not to mention this to anyone.”

[–] stabby_cicada@slrpnk.net 1 points 1 year ago

Do you think they're thinking "we'll be dead before things get really bad and fuck our kids" or "if we make our families super wealthy they'll be feudal lords after civilization collapses"?

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There's no oops or fuck about it. They are gleefully driving us off the cliff like Thelma and Louise with conservatives cheering the whole way down.

The best we can hope for is to exact some form of harsh justice before nature has its way with them. We are already dead either way. Will they die in luxury or will they die in the streets with the rest of us?