this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2023
1654 points (98.4% liked)

World News

39104 readers
2533 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atp2112@lemmy.world 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As far as I'm aware, neither of the striking unions have called for a consumer boycott.

[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world -1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

It's just kind of disgusting to be saying this shit jovially when people's lives and families are at stake and actors are publicly threatening to burn down CEO's homes. It reeks of sociopathic shit having absolutely no empathy or support for what people are going through.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one 4 points 1 year ago

He clarified his words after some people naturally started to take it a little too literally, but I don't think he needed to.

Whoever that "anonymous exec" was who said they wouldn't even start to negotiate until strikers started losing their homes deserves to be pilloried.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He clarified his words after some people naturally started to take it a little too literally, but I don't think he needed to.

Whoever that "anonymous exec" was who said they wouldn't even start to negotiate until strikers started losing their homes deserves to be pilloried.

[–] Lenins2ndCat@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Pretty sure this walk back is simply because of the legal implications. It's pretty obvious what he meant.

Pillory is too nice for them.

[–] CeruleanRuin@lemmy.one 1 points 1 year ago

Idunno, the pillory could get pretty brutal if the crowd was sufficiently riled up. It wasn't uncommon for people to bring stones or bricks.