this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2023
2328 points (99.1% liked)
Technology
59590 readers
4961 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related content.
- Be excellent to each another!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Approved Bots
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Personally, I find that this "sleekness" was misleading anyway. What was the first thing most people did once the "sleek" era started? Bought a case, sometimes like an OtterBox or knock off. That tripled the thickness of many phones, and even the most basic protective case came close to doubling the thickness. Back in the "old days" of slide out keyboards etc, the phones themselves had a decent case built in, so the "cases" were more fashion statements. And anyway, it's not like the Note 2 with a plastic back you could pop off was especially thick at the time. Honestly - a lot of the "problem" is intentional design to force buying new ones I think.
Look at ultrabooks - Lenovo proves with the X1 you can have an easily removable bottom using gasp metal and screws. Yet still be very thin. I honestly think the better solution for phones is just to have the battery be click on / external like power tools, drone batteries, older laptop batteries. The back of the battery is the back of the phone. There's no reason the contacts can't be press fit on the back of the phone and front of the battery - i.e. it doesn't have to be especially thick / deep.