this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023

122 points (91.8% liked)

Programmer Humor

19282 readers

798 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

Keep content in english
No advertisements
Posts must be related to programming or programmer topics

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Feyter@programming.dev

anzo@programming.dev

BurningTurtle@programming.dev

pylapp@programming.dev

122

I don't want to use ternaries (lemmy.xylight.dev)

submitted 1 year ago by Xylight@lemmy.xylight.dev to c/programmer_humor@programming.dev

20 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] orowith2os@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Doing everything explicitly can get to be annoying, especially when it comes to what you had to do before without Vulkan's VK_EXT_shader_object.

It's clear that some stuff should be implicit - most types in programming languages, for example; needing to specify a struct type and then the struct itself can be annoying - and other stuff explicit, like low level operations.

Returns are something that usually fall into that "implicit" category. Why should I do let a = function(); return a; when I can just do function()? It's shorter, simpler, and I don't waste keystrokes.