this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
1203 points (98.0% liked)

linuxmemes

20836 readers
1079 users here now

I use Arch btw


Sister communities:

Community rules

  1. Follow the site-wide rules and code of conduct
  2. Be civil
  3. Post Linux-related content
  4. No recent reposts

Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
1203
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by Smokeydope@lemmy.world to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
 

List of icons/services suggested:

  • Calibre
  • Jitsi
  • Kiwix
  • Monero (Node)
  • Nextcloud
  • Pihole
  • Ollama (Should at least be able to run tiny-llama 1.1B)
  • Open Media Vault
  • Syncthing
  • VLC Media Player Media Server
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 60 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Know what? Fine. I'll try Linux again. Tired of watching my craptop sit at 100% disk usage for 10 minutes before it starts responding. Mint is good to start with, ye?

[–] duckythescientist@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 months ago

If your craptop is using an HDD instead of an SSD, replacing it with an SSD would be a cheap upgrade you could do that would make a massive improvement.

[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Linux Mint cinnamon is gold standard for quality IMO. All my modern systems that can comfortably run it do.

That said it also uses more resources than your old craptop may like depending on just how old we are talking about.

If cinammon is a little slow, try mint xfce. Its a lot lighter on system resources. Last time i tried xfce it was a great performance compromise if a little unpolished in places.

If Mint xfce is also too slow you can give MX Linux a whirl. Its way faster and more minimal that mint out of the box. Yet it feels modern and allows you to install all the same programs as mint from the default software repo including flatpaks. MX fluxbox is probably as minimal as you would want to get. Try their flagship xfce first.

If you are trying to beat new life into a 25 year old dying dinosaur Puppy Linux will do it, but you won't enjoy using it.

[–] Manifish_Destiny@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

I prefer lmde but yes.

[–] quantumantics@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

On the hardware from the early '00s in my collection I've had good results from AntiX and Q4OS.

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

For a server for hosting services like in this meme? I always go Debian. Incredibly stable.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's mainly for movies and occasionally gaming on the go, and also my DDR machine. It's got a 1050 so it's... Not great, but it's had hard drive struggles most of its life and I've tried everything up to reinstalling windows.

[–] MadBigote@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago

Do you think your equipment is worth an upgrade? You could move frome a HDD to a ssd and have a major improvement.

Also, make sure the games you play can run on Linux.

[–] JoeyHarrington@lemmy.ca 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

You might want to upgrade to an ssd

[–] Johnmannesca@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I agree, it can also extend battery life due to less moving parts as well as an increased reaponsiveness

[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I agree, mint is a good place to start. If it turns out to be too much for your pc you could always try antix or q4os or puppy linux next, which is even more lightweight.

But I have recently found that mint is like a better version of ubuntu and I used to recommend ubuntu all the time because 9/10 times it just works.

[–] systemglitch@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

I recently put Linux on a 15 year old laptop, and tried many flavours of Linux. Debian was what I found worked the best.

I'm very happy with how responsive it has become. I do not do gaming, and it uses whatever integrated graphics was on the Intel chip.