this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2023
79 points (100.0% liked)

News

7 readers
7 users here now

Breaking news and current events worldwide.

founded 1 year ago
79
Economic inequality cannot be explained by individual bad choices, study finds (phys.org)
submitted 1 year ago by Girlparts@kbin.social to c/news@kbin.social
48 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

A global study led by a researcher at Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health and published in the journal Scientific Reports finds that economic inequality on a social level cannot be explained by bad choices among the poor nor by good decisions among the rich. Poor decisions were the same across all income groups, including for people who have overcome poverty.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Aesculapius@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does this mean my bootstraps aren’t enough?

[–] DarkGamer@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@Aesculapius It's funny, tragic, and sad that modern Republicans started using that phrase unironically. It actually means the opposite of what they think it does, it's clearly impossible to do:

Back in the 1800s, the expression “pull oneself up by the bootstraps” meant the opposite of what it does now. Then it was used mockingly to describe an impossible act.
An 1834 publication ridiculed a claim to have built a perpetual-motion machine by saying that the inventor might next heave himself over a river “by the straps of his boots.” An 1840 citation scoffs that something is “as gross an absurdity as he who attempts to raise himself over a fence by the straps of his boots.” source

[–] Pandantic@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

todayilearned material here.

[–] Midnitte@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's impossible, and yet the bootstraps narrative drives out good policy.

That's certainly a take of the author... "Yea, it's impossible. But... so?"

[–] Aatube@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

You're misunderstanding, the NYT is anti-Republican. The author means "yet Republicans can still somehow use this impossible claim to drive out good policy". Notice how it says good policy, not they goodly drive out policy.