this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
895 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19120 readers
3672 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Maryland House Democrats introduced a controversial gun safety bill requiring gun owners to forfeit their ability to wear or carry without firearm liability insurance.

Introduced by Del. Terri Hill, D-Howard County, the legislation would prohibit the “wear or carry” of a gun anywhere in the state unless the individual has obtained a liability insurance policy of at least $300,000.

"A person may not wear or carry a firearm unless the person has obtained and it covered by liability insurance issued by an insurer authorized to do business in the State under the Insurance Article to cover claims for property damage, bodily injury, or death arising from an accident resulting from the person’s use or storage of a firearm or up to $300,000 for damages arising from the same incident, in addition to interest and costs,” the proposed Maryland legislation reads.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So long as there are actual Nazis around, there exists a strong argument for it.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Nazis that have all the guns they could ever want and routinely go on killing sprees with them.

So what exactly is the argument? That maybe one day, the gun laws that armed Nazis might disarm Nazis, even though they'he completely failed to for their last 5 years?

Stop falling for bullshit gun-lobby marketing.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

Fine, you can choose to be utterly helpless when the nazis break down your door, and you will then go wherever they tell you. But at that point you can feel free to stop pretending you own the high road. And stop telling those of us who would fight back effectively that we have no such right.

The gun lobby absolutely does not market to people like me. Gun laws will never disarm nazis, only the minorites they wish to oppress.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago

This law isn't about having guns in your house. It's about having guns at the movie theater.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world -4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Thanks for sharing your little hero fantasy with us but you and your guns have done absolutely fuck all to shield anyone from Nazis.

But at that point you can feel free to stop pretending you own the high road

Sounds like the day you've lost the high road, not me. You were going to shoot all the Nazis dead with your cool guns remember? Now they're marching people off to camps.

It's such a difficult line of bullshit to work with isn't it? You need to proclaim the Nazis are coming, and that only guns can stop them, but they can't stop you with their guns, that they purchased from the same store, under the same gun-lobby authored laws.

And stop telling those of us who would fight back effectively that we have no such right.

Oh you're going to "fight back effectively" are you? So share with us all what your skills are. We don't know for certain they include "able to safely possess a competently use a firearm" because they're pro-gun community insist that shouldn't be a requirement.

Tell us all about the soldier these dead kids have bought us. Do you have any skills besides "gun"? Any military training? Can you set up a secure communication network? Are you able to administer basic first aid? Can you fly a drone? Fuck, tell us what you weigh.

Convince us that the fattest, shittest, most entitled army the world has ever seen is going to keep us safe from the people they almost certainly voted for.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

It's so strange that you think armed leftists have anything in common with your fairly accurate image of right wing chuds.

It is not the job of armed leftists to shield you from nazis. That job is for you and your mighty pens. Great job on that, by the way.

None of us have ever claimed to be heroes who are gonna kill all the nazis with our big bad guns. Self defense is not an offensive act. There are no nazis currently breaking in my door to drag me away. Do you expect me to go out seeking murder? Hell no. Now is the time to dismantle their propaganda networks, prosecute their leaders, bankrupt those who fund them, raise the minimum wage, establish single payer healthcare, safeguard human rights, separate church and state, and once and for all make bigotry and hate speech utterly illegal. We had best get on that.

No armed leftist has ever advocated for untrained irresponsible gun ownership.

You talk as if you think I expect to survive a Nazi coup. That world is not worth living in. Such a battle may very well be hopeless, but if your politicians fail to prevent it, it must be fought. No, I have no unprovable claims of competency for you to ridicule. I have nothing to prove. I'm not a badass. I expect to ensure that I do not go where they tell me. Rather the opposite.

I have never voted for anyone except Democrats since 2000. You're welcome.

I see you still have offered no viable solutions. I hope your pen is sharp.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world -1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's so strange that you think armed leftists have anything in common with your fairly accurate image of right wing chuds

Sure they do -- their opinions came out of the same sleazy boardrooms dedicated to maximising profits. They just replaced the conservative shit like "god" and "nuclear family" with "minorities" and you lapped it up just as eagerly.

It is not the job of armed leftists to shield you from nazis. That job is for you and your mighty pens. Great job on that, by the way.

Good to hear you admitting you're going to do fuck all except push hollow rhetoric.

But hey if you want me and my pen to stop the Nazis firing semi-automatic rifles into crowds of innocent people, we're happy to write up the new gun laws to prevent it.

At the very least, you could stop bankrolling the pro-gun lobby and their army of lawyers. Maybe you could skip the middleman and just donate $16 million a year directly to Republicans?

None of us have ever claimed to be heroes who are gonna kill all the Nazis with our big bad guns. Self defense is not an offensive act.

A comment that doesn't even hold true in this single comment section, let alone the rolling plains of AstroTurf that "leftist gun owners" call home.

No armed leftist has ever advocated for untrained irresponsible gun ownership.

I started to reply to this but then I realized just how fucking slimey it is. You've carefully positioned yourself to claim "even though we demand that training and responsibility remain entirely optional, a true leftist advocates gun safety".

Presumably by tutting at people on the internet.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

You're clearly determined never to listen. You refuse to accept that any gun owner could possibly not be a fat, stupid, fascist piece of shit. Good luck to you.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world -2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You've had 30 years for your lies to come true. I'm not giving you any more.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

What lies? It's not like liberals saw the fascists coming. The Black Panthers warned you. The coal miners of West Virginia warned you. The Native Americans warned you. The lynched black men warned you. Entire black neighborhoods bombed, burned, slaughtered, buried, and forgotten -- even in the hearts of Tulsa and New York City -- all warned you. The LGBT community warned you. Hong Kong warned you. Ukraine warned you. The Arab Spring warned you. Gaza warned you. You should have listened decades ago. You still can't accept that it can happen here. It has never not happened here.

Leftists fought and died for every right you hold today. We will do it again if we have to; if you, the majority, once again fail to do your job of ensuring a peaceful, equitable, prosperous society. We are not soldiers. We are your neighbors. We come in all colors, sizes, and genders.

Fascists have won the vote in easily a dozen countries this past decade. Sometimes they get voted out, sometimes without much violence, thankfully. They won in 2016 here. They barely lost in 2020. The South has warned you they would rise again since 1865. Now they're openly calling for Civil War II, and y'all do f*ck-all about it.

Yet you think those of us who actually care should be disarmed. You think we're the enemy. You think we want to fight and die? You think we want to hurt people? You think you've got this handled, all peaceful-like?

You had better be right.

[–] PoliticalAgitator@lemmy.world 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The Black Panthers warned you. The coal miners of West Virginia warned you. The Native Americans warned you. The lynched black men warned you. Entire black neighborhoods bombed, burned, slaughtered, buried, and forgotten -- even in the hearts of Tulsa and New York City -- all warned you. The LGBT community warned you.

Love the flowery rhetoric but if guns solved these problems, why aren't they solved? Why are they worse in America than other comparatively wealthy countries?

Here you are once again promising that guns are the solution to violence and oppression by listing all the times they haven't worked.

Leftists fought and died for every right you hold today. We will do it again if we have to

Sounds like it should be easy to list examples then. What rights have extremely permissive gun laws given me that people in other wealthy countries don't have?

We don't pretend to be heroes

Pretend is literally all you do.

When it's done, you'll forget all our names too, ignore our victories and losses, and claim all the credit

Oh yeah what kind of complete scumbag would take the credit for other peoples bravery and sacrifices? Certainly not you, as you use the word "we" repeatedly while claiming you're responsible for every right I have.

Remind us all again, what did you do specifically and how was it only possible by selling guns to people who hit their wives? What was your role in the Black Panthers? What battles were you at during the civil war?

and y'all do f*ck-all about it.

You've shot nobody. You may as well pretend you're a hero for buying an iPhone because it could theoretically be used to form a resistance movement.

Isn't it funny that for all your self-aggrandizement, I could name 100 fascists and 1000 ways they've grabbed power yet not a single time you and your guns have stopped them.

Yet you think those of us who actually care should be disarmed

You seem to be confused.

I think that deeply unstable people, racist extremists, idiots and domestic abusers should be disarmed. I just don't care if proving you're not one of those things makes your hobby inconvenient.

You think they should all be armed indiscriminately because one day you're going to use those same laws to shoot your way to a solution.

But you won't.

Because gun lobby catch phrases don't make you a revolutionary.