this post was submitted on 06 Oct 2023
758 points (87.6% liked)

Technology

59590 readers
4792 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
758
The Moral Case for No Longer Engaging With Elon Musk’s X (www.bloomberg.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
169 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The Moral Case for No Longer Engaging With Elon Musk’s X::The former Twitter is incentivizing violent content, which will only become worse to stand out to users.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] seitanic@lemmy.sdf.org 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm sure if we just ignore rich and powerful people, they'll go away.

[–] TheMauveAvenger@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They won't. But complaining about them on Lemmy and Bloomberg is empowering them.

[–] TwilightVulpine@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I get your point that major media outlets constantly talking about them is empowering them, but pretending that Lemmy talking about it has any effect whatsoever is vastly overestimating how consequential this place is.

I know a lot of people here are just sick to hear of the matter but lets not pretend that not talking about it is a moral stance.

[–] Psychodelic@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago

Lol. What?

[CITATION NEEDED]