this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
575 points (89.8% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
4416 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] z00s@lemmy.world 109 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Sure it's his money but does anyone else feel legitimately frustrated at all the good that this money could have done?

Rich dudes have always had vanity projects, but there is no grand concert hall or library or university to come out of this. Just a ruined company with millions of wasted hours of effort. For nothing.

[–] pgx@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The nice thing about our economic system is that value is rarely completely destroyed, the money he paid for Twitter didn't cease to exist, it went to former Twitter shareholders.

They may be using it in more productive ways than he ever would.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago

They may be using it in more productive ways than he ever would.

They use it to reinvest and hoard. Because that's what the investor class does, which is why they're useless.

[–] SpaceCadet@sopuli.xyz 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just to add a little explanation to those who don't get it: the man-hours spent by people working for then Twitter now X as well as resources used, uktimatelly for producing no wealth, could've instead been spent for something that did produce wealth.

Same amount of input money either way, but one produces wealth (in the economic sense of the word rather than merelly monetary) and the other just wastes manpower and resources.

[–] pgx@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

There has been value generated by Twitter that will outlive it though.

They established and refined an interface that other ventures like blue sky and mastodon are utilizing, and they delivered open source frameworks like Bootstrap will long outlive Twitter, and have brought value to the broader web development ecosystem.

[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

Consider whether Twitter was stifling some other growth. If you buy and burn down an advertising billboard, letting light into a market garden--perhaps that is beneficial.

load more comments (13 replies)