this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2023
575 points (89.8% liked)

Technology

59569 readers
4607 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 199 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Because he's doing everything to make it fail and destroy the platform, isn't it obvious?

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 123 points 1 year ago (6 children)

No, you don't throw away $44 billion just for shit and giggles, not even if you are as rich as Musk. Musk is (probably) a narcissist who thought he could make it work in his delusional mind.

He wanted a mouthpiece for the MAGA crowd, and he probably thought the desire in the population for it, would make it succeed, if he made the platform embrace that. He probably envisioned himself as a great liberator, who would be celebrated for bringing free speech back to America.

Musk has been losing it for a long time, and it seems to only get worse.

[–] steltek@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also, I don't think a narcissist would intentionally and publicly humiliate themselves the way Musk has done (Not a psychologist).

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago

Absolutely true, being humiliated is just about the worst thing for a narcissist.

An example of that, was when Elon Musk called the diver who actually rescued 13 children in Thailand a pedophile. Imagine that, calling the hero of the day a pedophile because you are butthurt!!

[–] crate_of_mice@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

No they definitely don't like to be humiliated, they probably feel that a lot more deeply that non-narcissists. But at the same time, they lack the self-awareness that would help them avoid getting into situations that would lead to humiliation.

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think a lot of “hardware” people underestimate software. Historically, hardware was way more complex but the hardware problems have kind of been solved. There’s only so many ways to design a phone or laptop. Software, meanwhile, has only become more complex and challenging.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I agree, but I don't see the point in this context?

The software to build and run Twitter, is probably not worth much besides for running Twitter. No Twitter means no value in the software for it either.

[–] dragontamer@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

No, you don’t throw away $44 billion just for shit and giggles

Why not? Elon Musk is famously on ketamine, ambien, and a whole slew of mind-altering substances.

Given how the contract was written, and given how much Elon Musk fought against the contract, it was obvious that he made a short-term decision (likely while high on some substance), and then quickly regretted buying Twitter. Within a week or two, he started a court case to NOT BUY TWITTER, despite signing an ironclad contract.

In my mind, its really fucking obvious what happened. Elon Musk partied a little bit too hard with some mixture of ketamine+ambien+alcohol, it mixed weirdly in his brain and he made a bad decision. A few days later, when he sobered up a bit, he realized how shitty of a decision he made but it was too late to roll things back.


Everything else Elon Musk has done is just... shitty reputation management. He's trying to convince the world he's still got it, despite making a bad (possibly drug-induced) decision

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 2 points 9 months ago

I wonder if he ever had it.

[–] MajorHavoc@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

"He cannot be that self deluded."

Narrator: He was.

[–] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 34 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I truly think this is all his fucking up, nothing else. He was trying to take away features that probably align with the people who gave him money, but had no idea how to make it work and make money and is desperate. Desperation makes you even more stupid.

[–] Clent@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I don't see the conspiracy.

My assumption is the investors immediately got what they wanted. They are not stupid.

Money men don't hand over money to these front men based on promises. This isn't a Hollywood movie. There was an immediate pay off.

They got SpaceX stock.

[–] aricene@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago

Investors will absolutely hand over money to front men making bad, even obviously insane, promises, though. People are always more easily manipulated than they like to believe, but people who've convinced themselves they're infallible titans of industry are even more vulnerable to it. (Especially the ones who think that they see through the scam and won't be left holding the bag.)

[–] PeleSpirit@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

I didn't say it was a conspiracy. I said they gave him money after he was already fucking up by paying around 30 billion more than it was worth, firing all the people that did stuff, and generally being a bad CEO so he would do what they want. More of a typical business deal really.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

Actually they may not be worth much either.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vYURUiOjZSw

Thunderfoot has spend a lot of time analyzing most things Musk, and SpaceX specifically does not have a market (TAM) to achieve what they claim.

[–] Sarcastik@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

So you've never heard of theranos or we work?

the only not-on-purpose piece was him having to buy it. idiot was forced to buy twitter, and then turned it into a "lets burn down a bastion of liberal speech" amongst his friends. he knows he wont suffer in any conceivable way, the saudis who fronted a huge chunk get what they want.

this was all setup shortly after he was forced to buy it. every step he has made since is in the playbook of "ruining your business", including mistakes he has personally made before.

[–] notapantsday@feddit.de 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know. The way it's going down, it really makes him look like an idiot. He could have just flipped the switch and turned it off as a massive demonstration of power.

Instead he's making one mindboggingly stupid decision after another, showing the whole world how utterly incompetent he is.

The most logical explanation for me is the easiest one: if he's making stupid and incompetent decisions, maybe he's just stupid and incompetent.

[–] Meowoem@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

You're saying the guy that has done nothing but look like a total fool for years could actually be a total fool? By the gods, I think you're onto something!

[–] be_excellent_to_each_other@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because he’s doing everything to make it fail and destroy the platform, isn’t it obvious?

It is tremendously obvious, I agree. At one point it felt kinda hyperbolic to say, but not for awhile now.

I'm not knowledgeable enough to be able to speculate what's in it for him, but it's 100% obvious that's what's being done.

[–] Vlyn@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He might call him self pro free speech, but he actually hates it (as long as it's not his own free speech). Getting rid of Twitter is a massive blow to free speech. One less platform where he and his companies can get outed and criticized on.

[–] BobKerman3999@feddit.it 8 points 1 year ago

I subscribed to the conspiracy theory of the banning of the jet tracker

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

It’s less nefarious than that. He wants to be a championed business leader. He’s just a fuck up who was forced to buy a platform that he never actually intended to buy (except for maybe a couple of days when he first suggested it). Sure, it will help his side when he runs it into the ground, but that’s not his intent despite being the cause.

[–] Steeve@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago

Like others have said, bullshit. He'll drive it into the ground and pretend that was his plan the whole time, like he's some undercover genius three steps ahead of everyone, when really he's just constantly playing catch-up with his narcissistic outbursts.

[–] phx@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago

That's like saying "my car may fail after I poured sand into the gas tank and replaced the electrical with speaker wires"

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I keep thinking there must be some high level plan here to destroy twitter for the good of humanity. I mean it's that or Elon actually just is that stupid. At this point the latter seems the most likely ...

[–] o_oli@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If he was destroying it for the good of humanity he would have to somehow destroy the concept of it rather than a single platform.

Probably best spending 40 billion on education in the harm social media can do lol.

I really do think he's just delusional. I won't call him an idiot because there is clearly intelligence and talent in his head, but he's gone off the rails in some capacity whether it's mental health issues or power crazed or who knows.

[–] BaronDoggystyleVonWoof@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It's probably drugs. He changed a lot the last few years.

[–] ChrisLicht@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You answer jibes with what I have seen plenty of while working with and funding serial entrepreneurs in the Valley: micro-dosing, coke, molly, steroids, random herbal shit, off-label usage of pharmaceuticals, trendy nootropics, blood transfusions, ayahuasca, and Adderall.

[–] Defiant@lemmy.cafe 2 points 1 year ago

Lay off the Kava Elon!

[–] gnuhaut@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

No he hasn't. The management of the old x.com (the one that got bought by paypal) threatened to walk if Elon wasn't removed from the office. He was always this incompetent.

[–] SIGSEGV@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Transcendant@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

You've got it back to front imo. Twitter was a useful tool for disseminating info, whether for protest movements, political movements, whatevs. Pre-Musk, there was a degree of control on twitter re disinfo, harassment, hatred etc. Now, it's no longer a useful tool for leftwing people to gather and share their thoughts; it's no longer a useful tool to disseminate information; it's no longer a tool for rallying protestors.

Look at who invested (Saudi kingdom); look at when Musk took it over (mid-terms); it seems pretty obvious to me that the takeover was a very expensive purchase to make the actions of oligarchs & despots that much easier.

[–] MammyWhammy@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Never ascribe to malice what can be ascribed to stupidity.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 4 points 1 year ago

A bad rule of thumb. Weaponized incompetence is a thing.

[–] kool_newt@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago

What if Elon was encouraged to buy twitter by people who knew he would fuck it up in short order for them?

If you want to take down a corporation, there's two main ways right now. Have Elon take charge, or have Ken Griffin short them into the cellar.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago

What about Elon Musk makes you think he'd do anything for the good of humanity?

[–] squiblet@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

That was my original thought when he came on and immediately fired 75% of the staff. It's not some savvy slimming down or cost-cutting. It was more like a wrecking ball.

It was fairly clear that his overall desire was the make the platform less useful for liberals and more for conservatives. It seems like he is content to destroy it if he can't achieve the latter.