this post was submitted on 19 Aug 2023
82 points (98.8% liked)

Technology

59693 readers
5094 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@fry.gs
L4s@fry.gs
enu@lemmy.world
82
Cruise robotaxi collides with fire truck in San Francisco, leaving one injured (www.theverge.com)
submitted 1 year ago by L4s@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Cruise robotaxi collides with fire truck in San Francisco, leaving one injured::A crash between Cruise robotaxi and a San Francisco Fire Department truck occurred last night in Tenderloin. The incident happed a week after the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) approved 24/7 autonomous taxi ride services.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Kecessa@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The difference being that autonomous vehicles could reach 100% safety by removing all non autonomous vehicles from the road and imposing a communication standard between vehicles so they all know what the other vehicles are doing at all times.

That only applies to regions of the world where there's no snow because autonomous driving in a snowstorm will probably never be solved.

[–] supercriticalcheese@feddit.it 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And making walking illegal

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

US has been working for that for decades.

[–] Kbobabob@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

I guarantee that it would still not be 100%. Maybe 99% or even 99.9%, but not 100%.

[–] reinar@distress.digital 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

"autonomous vehicle" in the article can't handle most basic shit like emergency vehicle approaching. I've spent enough years in automotive engineering and all of this autonomous drive bullshit is ADAS with a few gimmicks and shouldn't be nowhere near full control of the car, however this got out of hand and this shit is on public roads somehow.