this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
1006 points (84.7% liked)

Memes

45754 readers
2091 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not hating on open source, just let people use what fits their expectations and needs and stop deterring them with gatekeeping :P

UX = user experience

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] OboTheHobo@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I do find it a bit odd to monetize a client for a service which is 100% free. Not necessarily against it, but it bothers me slightly.

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I have to laugh at the 100% free moniker. Sure, the CODE is free. Do you seriously think hosting, domains, certificates, maintenance, and everything that goes into an instance just poofs out of nowhere? Seriously?

Lemmy and Mastodon are both paid products. Maybe you don't pay (and you should) but you should disabuse yourself of the illusion that Lemmy just happens.

[–] MooseBoys@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Even code is not free. Any decent developer writing code does so with an opportunity cost. If those developers want to provide that software to others for free, that’s great. But it still costs their own time and skills that they could be monetizing. For many people it’s a hobby.

[–] dx1@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Certs have been free for years.

[–] OboTheHobo@lemm.ee -1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

By 100% free I meant on the end of the client. And it's not like the money from the monetization of sync is going towards hosting lemmy servers.

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

And you've missed the point again.

You use Lemmy for 100% free because other people pay to keep the lights on.

Sync is no different. The dev needs to eat.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

Then we shall upload the dev to a computer so it does not need to eat.

[–] TurboDiesel@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not 100% free to the end client. Some of us pay our admins to maintain these instances. You get to use it for free, I'm glad you're blissfully ignorant of the people that allow you to keep doing that.

And yeah. He's asking to be paid for his work. What's the issue?

[–] OboTheHobo@lemm.ee 1 points 1 year ago

First off, you say the rest of us. Do you support lemmy financially yourself? (Genuine question, not trying to call you our or anything)

But that same thing can be said about all open-source software. I don't fully get your point. The reason the whole sync thing feels wrong to me is just because all that expensive fancy stuff, whether server hosting or the framework and protocol itself, isn't the service you're paying for. All that is free for the end user. Paying for essentially just the UI seems odd. It'd be like having a desktop environment for Linux that's paid only.

[–] agent_flounder@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes the app developer should totally work for free.

Also servers are free to run yay.

Seriously what in the world?

[–] s_s@lemmy.one -1 points 1 year ago

I pay proton to use their webmail service, even though email is a free service.

I pay to register a domain name even though typing URLs into a browser are free.

I pay to host my website even though visiting websites is free.

Right?