this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2023
250 points (100.0% liked)
Technology
37740 readers
650 users here now
A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.
Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Funny, I was just having that discussion with someone.
I think the problem is all these platforms think the platform is the value and not the content made by the users.
And of course, since they have the best platform, it'd be inconceivable that anyone would ever leave because they're the best.
Twitter, Reddit, Youtube, and Twitch are all doing exactly the 'value is the platform' while taking a massive shit on the creators and users that made the platform have any value in the first place, then acting confused why people are angry about how they're behaving.
No actual human gives a crap about the platform: nobody goes to these sites to go to the site, they go there for the content from someone they like.
This is exactly correct, and herein lies the problem: how do you monetize content creation from people you don't pay?
Louis Rossman said it best: when you look at a lot of content platforms, you realize their business models don't make sense. The people managing these companies are riding on VC money knowing full well there isn't any long-term return. They want to cash out and dip.
This is why I feel like a Federated, user-maintained system is probably best for the long term sustainability of a community. People want a place to enjoy something or someone? Let's make it happen, by our own means
Agreed. The community MUST own it's own platform or else they're just renters that can be evicted the minute someone thinks they can make money from them.
This also isn't just an online issue (though my view is US-centric). There's been a lot of talk about the decline of a '3rd place' and its loss impacting social gatherings. You have your house, work, and then your social spaces, and there's a very big lack of social places where gathering and relaxing are acceptable without also having to engage in buying permission to be there.
This carried over into a lot of people going online to find the same social gatherings, and then seeing the gathering places turned into profit centers for the owners without any discussion with the users of the space, and now they're finding that they don't have anywhere to go be social, and the online places that filled that gap are now vanishing as well.
Now I'm not a sociologist (just a simple country computer janitor), but it strongly feels like a lot of the hyper-tribalism and aggressiveness that people are exhibiting are a direct result of having all the social spaces torn away and turned into profit centers, with zero regards for the people who visited or contributed to them.
It just makes everyone more isolated and willing to hop on to whatever the next big 'social trend' that some algorithm drops in front of them, and I think at this point it's pretty unarguable that what the algorithms are doing is not always benign. You gain a place to belong, even if what you're belonging to is abhorrent and toxic.