this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
44 points (94.0% liked)

Australia

3618 readers
113 users here now

A place to discuss Australia and important Australian issues.

Before you post:

If you're posting anything related to:

If you're posting Australian News (not opinion or discussion pieces) post it to Australian News

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone. In addition to those rules:

Banner Photo

Congratulations to @Tau@aussie.zone who had the most upvoted submission to our banner photo competition

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

Moderation

Since Kbin doesn't show Lemmy Moderators, I'll list them here. Also note that Kbin does not distinguish moderator comments.

Additionally, we have our instance admins: @lodion@aussie.zone and @Nath@aussie.zone

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

countries with heavy helmet use have more head injuries per 100,000 miles ridden than those with low helmet use.

Now compare that to fatalities. There's the answer to your second sentence.

[–] uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, fatalities also go down. All hospitalizations do. It's not survivor bias, it's a solid inverse correlation between helmet use and injury. Netherlands, Denmark, Japan all have very low helmet use and very low injuries.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The three you just mentioned also have a heavy cyclist culture, and infrastructure in place that facilitates separate biking though

[–] uniqueid198x@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's quite true. And they got that via sustained policy to encourage cycling. It's been quite demonstrated that mandatory helmets actively discourage cycling, leading to both a disinvestment in infrastructure and drivers being less comfortable around cyclists (thus more dangerous)

I am not making a point about individual choices. Anyone should feel free to wear a helmet. But public policy is a different beast, and the data on mandatory helmets laws are inconclusive as to benefit and clear as to cost.

[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good lord, no.

If having to wear basic safety equipment that literally dons and removes in a split second 'discourages' you from cycling, you are either incredibly vain or outright lying to yourself about the true causes of not riding.

[–] stoic_sloth@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago

Most people are vain, yes.