He's kicking into x.ai. There are good reasons to think that he bought Twitter to use its massive data-set of human language to train an ai - NOT because he gave/gives a shit about Twitter as a profitable company.

If it becomes a paid competitor to OpenAI, it solves its profitability issues without enhancing "Twitter" as a social media site. Anything he said about improving Twitter was likely a lie designed to prolong usage of the platform and enhance the dataset.

[–] explodicle@local106.com 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Why did he have to buy Twitter to get the tweet data? Isn't it all publicly visible? (Seriously asking)

[–] Ultra980@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

[–] VirtualAlias@reddthat.com 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Lawsuit protection and the pairing of tweet data with internal demographics data? There's no telling what Twitter knows about its users from being installed on their phones(geocoding, network analyzation, etc.) to analyzing their advertisement engagement to sentiment analysis of word choice and it goes on and on.

[–] michaelrose@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Why would you think access to Twitter users nonsense is in any way an improvement over existing training data let alone enough make spending tens of billions for Twitter a good deal. He bought it because he said stupid shit and when he thought he could back out they were suing him to uphold the deal he made to buy it and they were going to win.